Clipmarks
Sign Up  Install  Learn More  Login 
ericwfollowshare
4
9-25-2007 12:32 PM864 views
ericw says:
A good article explaining Hillary's dominance and the inevitable political shift of the Democratic party.

David Brooks said:

Now it’s evident that if you want to understand the future of the Democratic Party you can learn almost nothing from the bloggers, billionaires and activists on the left who make up the “netroots.” You can learn most of what you need to know by paying attention to two different groups — high school educated women in the Midwest, and the old Clinton establishment in Washington.
2 Comments   | Add a Comment
9-25-2007 5:36 PM
ratilfar
David Brooks is a hack. He equates whatever he is thinking with the mythical "Center", instead of what it is, Imperial policy. If Hillary is sounding good to the likes of Brooks, I don't want anything to do with her.

Here is a response from someone who watches Brooks and his ilk:

The first tactic is merely the most commonplace conceit of the standard
Beltway pundit: Brooks takes whatever opinions he happens to hold on a
topic, and then -- without citing a single piece of evidence --
repeatedly asserts that "most Americans" hold this view, and then bases
his entire "argument" on this premise. Thus, the only way for Democrats
to have ...
read more»
10-31-2007 3:04 PM
righthand
If Hillary is sounding good to the likes of Brooks, I don't want anything to do with her.
Yes and if you have to dump on Carter that just proves the Democrats have no spine and are just another shade of red. PINK is probably right for them to deal with Hillary.

So why sell out the most effective out of office politician in America. Is he too honest and effective and show them all up as ineffective. With Bush's figures at the moment, ... well doesn't prove that scum rises to the top and that Carter is the cream.
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
Embed This Clip In Your Site...

OK