Yes, someone is well mixed up. The title and drift of the article seems to have totally missed the mark in this case.

The era of American leadership has passed.

What isn't clear from these words.

Think of all the American lives and of 'the rest' that were savable if Bush had an inkling of the coming disasters and total loss of prestige back in 2000! Has nothing been learnt by the Bushites? Would they still prefer Bush, totally self-deluded - with help from his friends - to a straight speaker who tells it as it is, even if he is part Black with a Muslim father and born in Kenya?

It is common for cult followers to continue believing in the disgraced former lea...

Yes, someone is well mixed up. The title and drift of the article seems to have totally missed the mark in this case.

The era of American leadership has passed.

What isn't clear from these words.

Think of all the American lives and of 'the rest' that were savable if Bush had an inkling of the coming disasters and total loss of prestige back in 2000! Has nothing been learnt by the Bushites? Would they still prefer Bush, totally self-deluded - with help from his friends - to a straight speaker who tells it as it is, even if he is part Black with a Muslim father and born in Kenya?

It is common for cult followers to continue believing in the disgraced former leader who is reviled by all - except the diehards. Misuse of critical faculties is a major abuse of human talents, lowering us to animal levels.

The confusion is probably on my part for dissecting a poorly organized article. The author seems to be ranting in this article. The title speaks of Zionist (bankster, military industrial complex, and policy makers (AIPAC)) influence on Obama's administration. This theory is however not proved too well in the article and barely half the article attempts to identify these Zionists. The rest of the article is an ongoing rant about American Imperialism. The current foreign policy leaks seem to show that this won't change much under Obama. It might be too simple to suggest that the main reason we are worried about the Middle East is solely because of Israel, but it seems obvious that this is the ...

The confusion is probably on my part for dissecting a poorly organized article. The author seems to be ranting in this article. The title speaks of Zionist (bankster, military industrial complex, and policy makers (AIPAC)) influence on Obama's administration. This theory is however not proved too well in the article and barely half the article attempts to identify these Zionists. The rest of the article is an ongoing rant about American Imperialism. The current foreign policy leaks seem to show that this won't change much under Obama. It might be too simple to suggest that the main reason we are worried about the Middle East is solely because of Israel, but it seems obvious that this is the case. This obsession with globalism or multilateralism is simply destroying our own sovereignty. Hence the end of our leadership, which is in the works. If one wants to put all hope in our government, then one might want to study up on constitutionalism because our founding fathers warned against all that is occurring. Our constitution has been undermined, destroyed, subverted, abused, misinterpreted, and ignored, and it isn't all Bush's fault. Not that I commend him, but this started a long time ago. I pray that our country will return to having faith in the Most High's heavenly government instead of obeying and trusting in the temporary laws of men. There is my hope. It is surely not in any man-made government.