jklugman says: It is really surprising and disappointing that Brandeis, with an large number of faculty and students committed to social change, would do this. I think they did the right thing. If they showed pictures of a bus full of people being blown up by a guy in a vest then I'd agree with you, but just showing bloody palestinians is nothing but propaganda. But school officials said the paintings were too one-sided.Well then maybe the school should have chosen to accompany the display of paintings with those which portrayed what it considers to be the opposing view. "If they showed pictures of a bus full of people being blown up by a guy in a vest then I'd agree with you, but just showing bloody palestinians is nothing but propaganda." Yeah, [url=http://www.ict.org.il/casualties_project/stats_page.cfm ]because[/url] [url=http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGMDE150312006?open&of=ENG-ISR ]we[/url] [url=http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGMDE150462005?open&of=ENG-ISR ]all[/url] [url=http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/D6056E2E-FFBE-4F53-A26A-52608D7B4744/ ]know[/url] [url=http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A534EA08-716B-452E-91D5-4E6147A08B9F/ ]that[/url] [url=http://clipmarks.com/... The problem is that Brandeis's move is so transparently double-sided. Do they insist that every art exhibit, every speaker who talks about Israeli victims of suicide bombings or defends Israeli actions be accompanied by the Palestinian viewpoint? Do they insist that every public function at Brandeis that expresses a viewpoint be paired with a counter-viewpoint? Most likely not. The real reason the exhibit was shut down was that it expressed an unpopular viewpoint and showed the consequences of the Israeli military actions in the Occupied Terrorities, which many Israel-partisans want to suppress. Either you're pushing the point about them doing the exhibit because you've got some anti-semitic streak or trying to be comical, I'm not sure which. Every time Israeli's sneeze in those parts - it's all over CNN and newspapers and on the Web. What military actions? We're fully informed about 'military actions' as they occur. You think pulling this exhibit does an iota of changing anyone's opinion or access to the situation down there? You can't be seriously thinking that... so what's wrong with the school trying to be fair... They didn't say they don't want to show the palestinian side period, they just thought it was too single-sided, which IT IS. As for the enforcement - do you have... 1. I am disagreeing with you about Israel; obviously, I must be anti-semitic. 2. We disagree about what kinds of atrocities are given the most exposure in the mainstream media. 3. "do you have any information where they showed an Israeli exhibit showing suicide bombers only?" No. I think it is obvious that Brandeis's action was unusual for a non-sectarian university of that calibur (rarely do universities interefere with students' freedom of expression or force them to present their views alongside an opposing view), and I think it's pretty obvious why--The viewpoint being expressed was an unpopular one. 1. I didn't say you WERE, I simply eluded that you might have a streak 2. Let's just say I view terrorist activities differently than either military or counter-terrorist activities. I would state that usually collateral damage on the palestinian side is unintended, although definitely present. On the Israeli side - it's intended to be nothing but collateral damage. 3. Well, universities should do more to make sure people are educated and not brainwashed. We've seen too many professors pushing their ideology, instead of teaching the subjects, presenting all views and letting the stude... 1. Of course I am not an anti-semite, nor do I have "streaks" of anti-semitism. I think it is grossly unfair that critics of Israel's conduct and occupation have to deny being prejudiced towards Jews, while people who say things like: "I find [Palestinians] evil because they send their children to blow themselves up to kill other men, women and children - that's evil in my book." don't get called on their gross stereotyping of an entire ethnic group/nationality/whatever. It seems to me this disparity occurs in the broader public discourse about Israel, witness the flap over the Walt & Mearscheimer paper--they get accused of being anti-Semitic despite the authors' protests to the contrary... 1. There was a study done throughout the middle east and over 98% either significantly dislike or hate the Jews. I'm sympathetic with your call for not being stereotypical, but the facts are on the table. I'm not familiar with the incident that you're describing and have no idea whether the person is anti-semite or not... that's not really relevant. Anyone can call anyone whatever they want... but what is relevant, at least to me, is that it's not a reciprocal type of warfare, i.e. an arab blows up bus full of civilians (I'm not trying to make a graphical point here, I'm just stating as it is) and in revenge or whatever you want to call it - the Israelis blow up a bus of their own. That's... 3. It's not a secret that most US universities these days are heavily liberal, so as much as I want to agree with you that it would be nice to have an open and fair debate on all issues and have students be creative, proactive and thoughtful, only one side of the equation is beiing taught in most schools. That's what I have a problem with. We should NOT have university professors who support organizations, physically, financially and academically that are pro-terrorist and anti-US. But we do, a number of them. But, we should also not have to deal with teachers sleeping with students in school, but they do and the whole education thing is another huge subject. I was amazed after immigra... Speaking of education - BigBadWolf, are you still with us? I just want to make sure you don't get a creative block after reading all of this. RS, individuals and organizations who claim to speak for Palestinians and Israeli Jews are responsible for many civilian deaths. According to the pro-Israeli think-tank, the Institute For Counter-Terrorism, the Israeli military killed 1099 Palestinian non-combatants while Palestinian militants killed 764 Israeli non-combatants. To me, that says that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a lot more morally ambiguous than "Bad Arab Terrorists vs. Good Israeli military, whose actions occasionally result in regretable civilian deaths". To me, that says that the justness of the actions of the Israeli state and military are wide... I don't know what survey you are referring to, if you have a link I would like to check it out. I do find it hard to believe that 98% of a large sample would agree on any issue. For a survey which suggests that both moderation and extremism are common among Palestinians, check this out--it shows that a majority of Palestinians support suicide bombings, but a large percentage oppose them, too. Given the conditions of the occupation, I don't find it hard to believe that many Palestinians dislike Israel or support violence towards Israelis. Are such people "evil"? I dunno. On Clipmarks we have travislaborde who has been advocating viol... Anyway, we went off the subject, or I did. I don't share your equation of Israeli and Palestinian approach to 'peace'. I do believe that the Israelis would want peace and I don't believe the Palestinians do. Also I have a very dificult time justifying anyone who's making points by blowing up children, intentionally. The survey I mentioned I heard on the radio, I'll try to find the info if I can. My 'beef' is with anything biased blatantly in on direction, on just about any topic. Anyway, as another gentlemen eluded in another comment - we'll have to agree to disagree. “If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the process of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence..” — Justice Louis D. Brandeis (this bit of irony courtesy of Jewschool) You want to go on... ok... Here's the major fallacy with your approach - you're telling this to me, even though I share in your desire to be free and fair. Why don't you try it on both Israelis and Palestinians? I think the Israelis will listen to you, as exemplified in the fact that they published the very quote you cited. Palestinians - I would bet that they couldn't care less what you have to say. And that's where the problem is - it's not me - it's them. They don't want discussions! Period. I don't know if you're Jewish or not, but if you are - they want you dead!!! And that's with the fact that they don't even know you! That's why to me you don't put up an exhibit showing their ... RecordSage, please don't feel compelled to answer every one of my comments. That comment wasn't actually directed at you, it was a delicious bit of irony that I couldn't resist from sharing with you guys, and a comment on this clipmark seemed the logical place to put it. I'll just say that even if your generalizations about Israelis and Palestinians are correct (and I doubt they are), that still would not justify Brandeis suppressing their students' freedom of expression. If you want the last word, go ahead and take it. |
View the Top Clips from May 3, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
New from the makers of Clipmarks: Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!
|
|