Clipmarks
thisnamecantbetakenfollowshare
1-6-2007 12:44 PM
1036 views
tags:,
"Before 1979, the US government strongly supported The Iranian nuclear programmes."
15 Comments   | Add a Comment
1-6-2007 12:50 PM
ekorstanje
Yes, that's the way it is done. You support policies when they can make money for you or U.S. corporations, then you turn on the same countries when you can make more money stealing all there natraul resouces.
1-6-2007 12:50 PM
ekorstanje
It's called regime change.
1-6-2007 12:54 PM
thisnamecantbetaken
It could even be called WWIII if we're not very very careful.

Bombing Iran is not only illegal and unjust, it is an unacceptable risk. The risks of "stopping Iran" are greater than not "stopping Iran." It isn't just my opinion that the risks that come with military actions against Iran are unacceptable. Look at the conclusion drawn from war-game simulations of attacking Iran. The final conclusion after running through many options was expressed by General Gardiner, a simulations expert at the U.S. Army's National War College:

"After all this effort, I am left with two simple sentences for policymakers," Sam Gardiner said of his exercise. "You have no military solution for the is...
1-6-2007 12:59 PM
ekorstanje
I don't think these neo-cons think of what will happen or the results of their attack. They just have a one track mind, black and white... If they gamed it and it turned out bad they woud just ignore it and say your being pessimistic. These people are crazy and fanatics.
1-6-2007 1:06 PM
thisnamecantbetaken
It scares me to no end, that they are actually seriously considering pre-emptive nuclear attacks against Iran. I mean, can't they even begin to see the horrific consequences it could have? Not only on the civilian Iranians, but on the whole world? The fall-out alone will be an environmental disaster.
1-6-2007 1:15 PM
ekorstanje
Well I think what you got in power now are the basically the same people that were telling JFK during the Cuban Missle Crisis to bomb and invade on the first day. Those people are in charge now.
1-6-2007 3:34 PM
ifazal
they cant eliminate Islam & its great believers.
1-6-2007 8:03 PM
LGagnon
I agree that we shouldn't let them trick us into another war. However, I'd add a little bit more to that statement: ever again. To be truly anti-war, one must be against war itself, not just the war at hand.
1-7-2007 3:37 AM
thisnamecantbetaken
Well said LGagnon... No more war EVER!!
1-9-2007 9:25 AM
UpStateMike
Good luck with that.

Jihad is not going to stop trying to kill any and all nonbelievers just because you don't want to fight them. In fact, they are not willing to stop until the entire world is under their harsh version of Islam Law, and there is no room for Christians, Jews, Buddhists, and Athiests.
1-9-2007 11:10 AM
LGagnon
Do you even know what jihad means? It doesn't mean holy war like you've been told by Fox News and fundamentalists.

And might I add that Christians are just as nuts; it's just that you don't hear the news of their terrorist attacks in the mainstream news reports.
1-9-2007 5:48 PM
DizzyDezzi
touche' , LGagnon
1-10-2007 10:18 PM
Thorne
Well, we don't hear about american christian terrorists on mainstream news. But Ireland is another story, eh?? (are catholics considered christians?? )
1-10-2007 10:58 PM
LGagnon
Yes, Catholics are Christians. Pat Robertson may not think so, but they are.
1-11-2007 1:30 PM
Thorne
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK