kmcolo says: The Bush administration should have been forced to pay for this war in a way that was consistent with their ideology. On the financial markets. It long ago would have been rendered just another failed Bush business. But we are forced to continue to pay for his psychological issues with his dad. Everyone had to have known that he was going to go back into Iraq because of the perceived failure durring his father's conflict. This is the problem with generational elections. Don't misunderstand me, the Bush name is a good name, when it comes to leadership, maybe he should have learned to follow orders before he gave them. Ask any person that has been in the military what kind of officer they would follow to the death: A Mustang. To be a great leader one must know what it is like to be in the trenches, then they will think a little bit harder about sending people into them. In mathematics a google ( I believe it is spelled googol) is 10 to 100 power. That is 1 followed by 100 zeroes. You should have seen my reaction to the clip title. It would not have been surprising to hear someone actually suggest this. However, thanks for the perspective on the monetary cost of the war in Iraq. That's pretty inexpensive when the US can finance a war on 2.68 times the worth of a company. |
View the Top Clips from June 23, 2007
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
New from the makers of Clipmarks: Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!
|
||||