let them free .. ) at least at their own cell .... )) Yet another clever idea. Remember the higly successful *naive* sex abstinence programmes meant to prevent the spread of STDs. You guys are brilliant. Encouraging unrestrained sexual indulgence really has reduced crime in our country, hasn't it? Our nation was so overrun with crime when people were taught self-control, wasn't it? How is the sand looking down there? Perhaps if they are expected to act like men and not animals they might actually live up to it. i'm not understanding yankeepoo's position, there was crime always throughout history. prominent in the 1950s was what organized crime, wife beaters, murderers... that it wasn't as public (sexuality) doesnt mean it wasn't there either- plenty of audulturors and out-of-wedlock pregnancies, rape etc. as well. granted, though, a lot more men would hone up to responsibility than now. abstinence only was a joke and still is, the only way you can teach abstinence today is by teaching safe sex right next to it; which might not be a bad idea. masturbation versus sodomy, i cant imagine people taking the side of sodomy when put together like that. and masturbation should somewhat reduce the urges... "9 of of 10 males wank, and the tenth one is a LIAR!" Maybe it is for medical reason! They don't want them going blind! Maybe it is for religious reasons! It's dirty and will fall off! Maybe the nut in charge isn't getting enough at home, and doesn't want anyone else getting some! Maybe we should have a poll for the best reason why any state would be involved in a more or less private activity. Who checks out the evidence? I start thinking of Monica and the extraordinary preserved dress with the trophy semen??? Equally as bazaar and yet chosen to be believed but only in America. Next thing you know, they'll be criminals for simply needing to eat and breathe. "I didn't do it, your Honor! It was a wet-dream!" |
View the Top Clips from August 5, 2007
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
