 merrie says: A quick thought on the GOP debate: During an immigration back-and-forth, McCain said (something like): "You can spend your entire fortune mischaracterizing my immigration position but that still won't make what you say true." After Romney complained about getting misquoted by the AP, McCain chimed in with: "If you keep changing your positions you're going to get misquoted every now and then." At one point he said, seemingly apropos of nothing: "I just want to say: Governor Romney--we disagree on many things, but you are the candidate of change." He had trouble suppressing his laughter as he said this. I could see the pundits proclaiming Mitt the loser since he took so much incoming fire. But my hunch is that it won't play that way among voters. The Corner On National Review Online Friday, January 04, 2008 Helping Huck [Mark R. Levin] I am informed that Dick Morris and Newt Gingrich are helping Huckabee behind the scenes. Morris has been everywhere today promoting Huckabee. http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NDgxNDAwMWY0ODYzNGRiMDc3YzRkZTBlMDZiOGU3YzM= What I don't understand,....is,......Why isn't the delegate count given even mild attention. Aren't they committed? I mean, couldn't Romney come in solid second in every state, with winners alternating among the other candidates, and Mitt would have it sewn up after super-Tuesday. Am I correct? Or am I missing something obvious that is common knowledge? I do understand the psychological momentum factor of the top winner and the excitement by media and pundits to talk about it in those terms, but this seems like an even deeper layer of delusion and "sheeple"-ness than I already thought it was. Romney is way out in front by the delegate count. (granted the Wy.deal,etc,etc. but every event so f... |
View the Top Clips from January 6, 2008
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
|
New from the makers of Clipmarks: Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!
|
||||||
