Lexica says: More: How did one of our great political parties become so ruthless, so willing to embrace scorched-earth tactics even if so doing undermines the ability of any future administration to govern? Maybe the conservatives are trying to make up for eight years of Bush bashing? Or just maybe the Conservatives are just what they appear to be: intellectually challenged, and ethically deficient . And too immature to even be embarrassed by their own childish outbursts. Thanks for demonstrating that you did not in fact read the original article before commenting, jay8h: Anyone surprised by the venomous, over-the-top opposition to Mr. Obama must have forgotten the Clinton years. Remember when Rush Limbaugh suggested that Hillary Clinton was a party to murder? When Newt Gingrich shut down the federal government in an attempt to bully Bill Clinton into accepting those Medicare cuts? And let’s not even talk about the impeachment saga.Don't even start on the claims about "Bush bashing". The difference between liberals criticizing Bush and conservatives criticizing Clinton and now Obama is the difference between a BB gun and a howitzer. And as always, conservatives are above reproach. "The difference between liberals criticizing Bush and conservatives criticizing Clinton and now Obama is the difference between a BB gun and a howitzer." Lexica, in your opinion only. And anyone who whines about the Clinton years must have forgotten about the Reagan years, specifically the first every Borking of a judicial nominee by one Ted Kennedy. n2sooners: And, of course, l'affaire Bork set the tone for the entire 8 years of Reagan's tenure. You're arguing that the tone and quality of the opposition to Reagan from the left was comparable to what Clinton, and now Obama, we're/are targeted with based on Bork? Over the course of 8 years? I think the evidence doesn't support you on this one. --- The Republican Noise Machine has had to go into vitriolic, radical mode since they can see the country is turning away from them. The radical, frothing, ideological conservatives are those who are staying part of the Republican (Tea) party, and they're turning ... The Reagan years? Yeah, the years were many a Democrat voted for Reagan, especially to reelect him in 1984? Those years. Really. C'mon the vitriol from the far-right and growing. In fact it even increased during the Bush years under the rubric of "you're either with us or against us". It was until Katrina that people woke up to the disaster that was Bush and his cronies. Also n2 don't confuse criticism based on facts to hyperbolic nonsense based on fear, superstition and yes even racism. |
View the Top Clips from October 5, 2009
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
||
|
|
|||
|
New from the makers of Clipmarks: Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!
|
|||