<div style="margin: 12px 0px; font-family: arial; color: #333333; background: #ffffff; border: solid 4px #e5e5e5; width: 100%; clear: left;"><div class="CM_CTB_Content_Wrap" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;background-color: #ffffff;"><div style="border-bottom: solid 1px #dcdcdc; white-space: nowrap; margin-bottom: 8px; background-color: #eeeeee ;background-image: url(http://clipmarks.com/images/source-bg.gif); background-repeat: repeat-x; height: 24px; line-height: 24px; vertical-align: middle; padding-bottom: 4px; color: #666666; font-size: 10px;" ><a href="http://clipmarks.com/clip-to-blog/" title="see clips that are hot right now"><img src="http://content.clipmarks.com/blog_embed/846a7435-8ed3-41a9-881c-7c79207dca42/8253B2AF-09E0-4D90-91F1-95AE896F8DA5/" alt="" width="19" height="19" border="0" style="vertical-align: middle; margin: 0px 4px; display: inline; border: none; float:none;" /></a>clipped from <a title="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fasterforward/2008/07/court_invites_viacom_to_violat_1.html" href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fasterforward/2008/07/court_invites_viacom_to_violat_1.html" style="font-size: 11px;">blog.washingtonpost.com</a></div><blockquote style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;" cite="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fasterforward/2008/07/court_invites_viacom_to_violat_1.html"><H3>Court Invites Viacom to Violate YouTube Viewers' Privacy</H3></blockquote><div style="height: 2px; font-size: 2px; background: #dcdcdc; border-bottom: solid 1px #f5f5f5; margin: 2px 4px;"></div><blockquote style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;" cite="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fasterforward/2008/07/court_invites_viacom_to_violat_1.html"><P>Not for the first time, a court ruling in a copyright-policy case has made privacy rights an afterthought. Last week, U.S. District Court Judge Louis L. Stanton ruled that <STRONG>Google</STRONG> had to hand over video-viewing records of its <STRONG>YouTube</STRONG> subsidiary to <STRONG>Viacom</STRONG>, which alleges that YouTube built a business on the unauthorized sharing of Viacom's copyrighted works and seeks at least $1 billion in damages. </P></blockquote><div style="height: 2px; font-size: 2px; background: #dcdcdc; border-bottom: solid 1px #f5f5f5; margin: 2px 4px;"></div><blockquote style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;" cite="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fasterforward/2008/07/court_invites_viacom_to_violat_1.html"><P>As my colleague <STRONG>Ellen Nakashima</STRONG> <A href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/03/AR2008070302359.html">wrote</A> in Friday's Post, the ruling will require Google to provide its viewing log --12 <A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terabyte">terabytes'</A> worth of data containing "the unique login ID of the viewer, the time he began watching, the Internet Protocol, or IP, address of the user's computer and the identification of the video." </P></blockquote></div><div style="margin: 0px 6px 6px 4px;"><table style="font-size: 11px;border-spacing: 0px;padding: 0px;" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tr><td style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;">&nbsp;</td><td align="right" style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;width:107px" width="107"><a href="http://clipmarks.com/share/8253B2AF-09E0-4D90-91F1-95AE896F8DA5/blog/" title="blog or email this clip"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/images/c2b-foot.png" border="0" alt="blog it" width="107" height="17" style="border-width:0px;padding:0px;margin:0px;" /></a></td></tr></table></div></div>

New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!