refutes the lame argument that no "Palestinian State" existed, when neither did "Israel". Israel has no legally defined borders, no constitution, and is constantly expanding under plea of "divine right", granted by the arbitrary and usurping powers of a United Nations setup to reorganize the world.

Some choose to believe that no other civilization ever existed in Palestine, neither prior to nor between the assumed destruction of the Second Temple by the Romans in 70 CE until the founding of Israel in 1948. But what about irrefutable facts? For example, the Israeli Jerusalem Post was called the Palestine Post when it was founded in 1932. Why Palestine and not Israel? Whose existence, as a definable political entity, preceded the other? The answer is obvious.

How would Americans react if the UN declared that Mexico should suddenly be expanded to its historic borders, within the United States, being granted Arizona, New Mexico, and California? Then Mexico builds walls, separates the peoples, establishes checkpoints, ID cards, barb wire, and military occupies (and bulldozes American neighborhoods) in these states, by force of military force? Just guess what American's reaction would be and you have an idea of how the Palestinians feel! Tell me that "terrorism" (resistance to tyranny) would not break out and that American would be "peaceful" and "acknowledge the right of Mexico to exist".