Clipmarks
graphictruthfollowshare
4-19-2008 12:04 PM611 views
Do extremism and an unconditional adherence to religious dogma result from a failure of a portion of the frontal lobe to fully develop or, if fully developed, to activate? Studies suggest that faithful adherence to a single reasoning strategy on tests such as the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test means that parts of the frontal lobes are inactive, have failed to fully develop, or have even been damaged. Thus, unqualified disdain for divergent beliefs,for personal interpretation, and for creative theories like Darwin’s theory of evolution, may indeed have, at least a partial, biological explanation: a reduced utilization of that section of the brain which has played such a vital role in humanity’s creative advances—the frontal lobes. By unconditionally obeying religious tenets—or any dogma—some people may be relying on the phylo-genetically older, more posterior portions of the brain that store knowledge and enable consistent or stable behaviors and, unknowingly, circumventing the portion whi
3 Comments   | Add a Comment
4-20-2008 4:58 PM
AcesLucky
So, we can make ourselves less intelligent by adhering to a set mental pattern that disengages the ability to explore other mental avenues. Developing a "habit" way of thinking, in other words.
4-20-2008 6:20 PM
graphictruth
It's called "thought-stopping" in the context of brainwashing. Which leads us right back to many sorts of cultic and religious sorts of mind-sets.
4-21-2008 11:48 AM
AcesLucky
With all due respect, I suppose we are all guilty of that kind of thinking in one way or another.

I remember when Marilyn Vos Savant was posed what's called "The Game Show" problem, and some of the most well trained mathematical minds on the planet said she was wrong until she posted several explanations and a 'truth table' proving she was correct.

Slowly but surely those MIT professors in mathematics and physicists and so forth began seeing a better picture, and apologizing publicly because they had been so wrong.

Many even thanked her for standing pat on an objective proof that didn't depend on "their" way of sorting things out mentally.

That problem was a turning point in how I thoug...
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up





Embed This Clip In Your Site...


OK