Clipmarks
BobbyRutanfollowshare
4-2-2009 8:37 AM
333 views
BobbyRutan says:
The action deepened a fracture line between environmentalists and industry. Moreover, it casts a spotlight on two federal regulators: the US Army Corps of Engineers, which gave Coeur the green light, and the US Environmental Protection Agency, which is accused of violating its own standards.

Environmental attorney Tom Waldo with the firm Earthjustice says that the impetus for the Clean Water Act was a legacy of contamination and public health concerns caused by industrial companies, municipalities, and agriculture historically treating waterways as convenient, expendable repositories for waste.

He points to a benchmark ruling during the 1970s against the Reserve Mining Co. in Minnesota, which disposed of taconite tailings, laden with asbestos, into Lake Superior from its processing facility, contaminating drinking water. In the US West, water quality in an estimated 40 percent of rivers has been impaired by historic mining sites long abandoned.
1 Comment   | Add a Comment
4-3-2009 6:15 PM
citizenbfk
This is just another reflection of the heart of the Bush Administration: torture, war based on lies, invasion of civil rights, (now we hear of death squads), and pollution.

At one time we could dump untreated waste and dangerous chemicals all over the earth - maybe -- and it would dilute or dissipate and not be harmful - perhaps.

But these are not those times. We have to change careless assumptions like that.

I read some history of where I live, in desert/mountains Southwest USA, and it's hard to believe we're talking about the same place.

Cowboys from where I live talked about trees and water and jumping on their horses to go out and shot a few buffalo for diner as casually as we might ...
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
Embed This Clip In Your Site...

New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK