Clipmarks
   
  
   
Imncladyfollowshare
9-1-2008 10:31 PM
697 views
Imnclady says:
Who says it isn't hurting anyone to be without health insurance....not I...it makes sense to put off check ups when you don't have the money to pay or to wait as long as you can hoping you feel better when you get sick...They know it is hurting us, They did a Study on on it.

So how can we ignore the truth?
24 Comments   | Add a Comment
9-1-2008 10:36 PM
masbury
Ironically, if John McCain were not on government health insurance, he (having had cancer four times) would probably be uninsured. Shocking, isn't it - that Senators have government insurance from which they can't be cancelled - and the R's don't think we should have it?
9-2-2008 6:09 AM
debbyski
I think we should invest in our biggest resource for a change.
9-2-2008 6:30 PM
Jorjor
Speaking as someone who's been on SSDI and Medicare for a while, I can vouch for the poor treatment people with marginal health care get in the US. In an annual ritual, I receive my enrollment forms for MedicAid, which promises me dental, prescription coverage (pre-plan D) and a higher level of medical coverage. The first two times this happened, I signed up for much-needed dental work and other chronic condition care, only to be told that my coverage had been withdrawn because my disability income was too high. Now I just throw them out.
9-3-2008 12:09 AM
masbury
Thanks for sharing that, Jorjor, it's exactly what needs to be said. Those whom these programs serve have far too little voice in how they are designed.
9-3-2008 4:02 AM
RecordSage
R's don't think you should have it, nobody is stopping you from getting it. R's don't think you should rob someone to get the coverage you need. Listening to voices here - it's like every liberal in America is without health insurance, which means none of them work.

No question that health industry needs to be reformed, made more efficient & effective... the first step of which to eliminate John Edwards of this world and stop suing doctors as it was a favorite past time. Getting the MSAs implemented would be the other helpful item and certainly take care of the ones who can't work or are disabled. But the entitlement approach is both unfair and will lower the quality of US healthcare....
9-3-2008 4:27 AM
Jorjor
I have a sister and a nephew who live in Canada and they have nothing but good things to say about their health care system. The US market is geared to satisfying stockholders and CEOs, not customers' needs. I suppose that's okay if you're taking something like a few pennies worth of sweet syrup, adding a couple liters of fizzy warter and retailing it for $1.60. But only by taking the profit motive out of insuring the nation's health will keep the insurers from making decisions that do not have the patients' best interests foremost. Medicare can work, but there are a lot of people in government who are doing their best to both sabotage it and tarnish its image.
9-3-2008 8:26 AM
debbyski
Zasel lives in Canada and I have spoken personally to him about this and he also had nothing but good things to say about the health care system there.
Is taking away the right to sue for medical malpractice from the people who suffer that injustice the correct way to lower medical costs? NO, it's just another way to give those people the royal shaft while making the insurance companies richer and richer. I'll compare my personal income vs. insurance premiums I pay to any doc's any day of the week, and he'll come out saying we are all on the same boat, but baby, I'm on a life raft while he is on a yacht.

Listening to voices here - it's like every liberal in America is w...
9-3-2008 8:52 AM
Jorjor
Some years ago, before th injury that put me on disability, a had a very good consulting job that paid $25 an hour. Despite living in a DINK household, the only medical insurance available to me amounted to more than I could afford. I was lucky that my wife had a job that provided insurance with spousal coverage. Of course, that went away when she died, but by then I'd left consulting for a full time job with benefits, but it still failed me. The HMO I had refused to allow me an EEG when I started having memory gaps because the tests couldn't be "cost justified". It later turned out that I was epileptic, had a seizure while driving and cause a fatality that never would have happened if ...
9-3-2008 9:21 AM
skwirlinator
On a personal note;
I know more people now that don't have any insurance than ten years ago.
Including myself.
I have seen the quality of life zapped from more of my aquaintences in the last 5 years than ever before in my life.
I called welfare to see if I qualified for medical insurance and they told me the cutoff income for my size family is $258 per month. Who in this great nation survives on $258 @ month?! Last month I made $800.
They said I make too much money for assistance.
In other words they told me to go fuck myself. I am not a tax paying citizen worthy of assistance in a time of need. My needs are not worthy. Let me rot.
oh yeah, The school that my govt requires and taxes me for ...
9-3-2008 9:33 AM
skwirlinator
My work has insurance - My copay is $25
My dr ($25) sends me to a specialist ($40) who sends me to another specialist ($40) who writes me a prescription ($58) that doesn't work. I go back to my dr ($25) and he sends me to another specialist ($40) who prescribes me a week supply of a drug that starts to work ($38) but tells me I have to do a followup ($40) to get a refill ($38) and do a followup with my pricare ($25) and my shit is still not fixed.
Not to mention the fact that I am driving 20+ miles one way to see these people.
Now, I don't have a dr or a specialist or a prescription because nobody seems to know what is causing the problem. If I want to travel to the city and see another spe...
9-3-2008 9:47 AM
skwirlinator
Typical dr day
Wake up sick, go to work, work 3 hrs (+$27). Clock out and go across town to my DR ($25). He tells me he needs me to see a specialist. Gas up car($15) drive 24 miles and sit in specialst office for appx 1 hr. Pay fee ($40). Specialist looks at me, decides to send me to another specialist ($40) across that town. That specialist states that he isn't sure what is wrong and suggests a different specialist in St Louis (60 miles 1 way). Since I can't afford to go, I leave and go home, still sick. Since there is only an hour sor so left in my shift I don't go back to work(-$36). I'm now on empty again, no script for relief and missed most of the day at work. I made $27 this day. I sp...
9-3-2008 11:14 AM
RecordSage
I agree with you skwirlinator, it needs change as I described. Obviously people who get older are in tougher situation, spouses die, the employment possibilities deteriorate, thus the quality of life as well. No question. Medicare does work, debbyski, but it's going bankrupt and that's where the problem with it is. Our government is way too inefficient, there are way too many people (who shouldn't be on assistance) that are on assistance. And I'm completely for people's ability to sue, provided there's merit, not when you're too dumb not to spill a cup of coffee in your lap and then sue for $6million - that's what I'm against. And for the record, I had a guest just last week who was fro...
9-3-2008 11:19 AM
skwirlinator
Thanx RecordSage - Good to see from you again!
9-3-2008 11:36 AM
RecordSage
Likewise, skwirlinator.
9-3-2008 11:47 AM
Imnclady
Isn't this all a shame...imagine if we had a forum just about health care for the citizens in every state. Then the government officials and senators could see how bad it really is.

Of course I doubt any of them would want to volunteer to report on what the average person goes through because of our health or health care issues.

But having a forum would provide a good way to get up petitions...if they ( the ones in government on our behalf ) aren't going to do anything about it, why can't we force the it ?

"They" are the one's who brought up the "Quality of Life" saying but aren't doing a damn thing about it.
That's why we have organizations and charities who get government grants to a...
9-3-2008 11:48 AM
Jorjor
Until Medicare Part D was started up, I had a no-copay on my prescription medications; full price at the local Walgreens or CVS was nearly half my monthly income. I turned to a Canadian internet pharmacy and ended up paying a third of that. At one point, my doctor sent me to a Wal-Mart, which was advertising $7.00 per prescription. They charged me $30.00 per, and refused to explain the difference.

Every year, there's a deductable on my Medicare amounting to more than my monthly income. On the occasions when I have had to get medical treatment, I have run up bills which I am unable to pay unless I give up such things as food, rent and utilities. So, the bills don't get paid, the clinic o...
9-3-2008 12:42 PM
debbyski
Thank you RS. IMHO, I'd like to see more of our tax dollars spent not on a insane cold war style military build up, but for things that benefit us like a better infastructure and health care for all our citizens. I hear these stories like the ones from Skwril and Jorjor and I only wish they could have the health insurance my family does. I have a $5.00 co-pay for the doctor visits until $100.00 yearly co-pay is met and all the in hospital is absolutely free. Prescription drugs are a $5.00 co-pay per prescription until a yearly fee of $50.00 is met. I'm never sick. I don't go to the doctor unless it's for an annual screening. But I'd like to speak further on this lawsuit thing. The fa...
9-3-2008 12:48 PM
debbyski
expecting him to have another broken leg or something like that. When she got there, they told her he was dead. She told me she threw herself on the floor and cried and screamed hysterically. I can't even imagine it. Anyway, it was a four year battle with attorney's, and depositions and private detectives; you name it. I can't tell you how little money we ended up with. I can tell you this though. The lady in the lawsuit with us ended up a millionaire. How much good did all that money do her? Well, she died a year later. Maybe it was the stress. Maybe it was a broken heart. Maybe it was both; who knows? But I'm proud of this and so was she. We got that unsafe design off that ma...
9-3-2008 3:09 PM
NonStatQuo
I don't have health insurance. I worry about my some health issues and have noticed some oddities etc that I wish I could afford to have checked out. If I do, and pay for it myself, and find nothing wrong then it's ok. If I find something wrong, try and get health insurance when I can afford it, then I will get into problems because of "preexisting conditions".

9-3-2008 3:42 PM
RecordSage
debbyski, don't get me wrong. Your story is very sad (although I'm very glad your husband at least escaped death) and in that kind of circumstance - absolutely these people should've been sued... but the problem we have is (as you stated) is that the process is lengthy and it's the lawyers who make a mint - that's wrong. In a case like you mentioned - I'd like to see a single trial and for a hefty sum, VAST MAJORITY of which going to the victims, NOT their lawyers. After a second accident with the same problem - I'd like to see this company sued again, but the verdict not just being a payment or settlement, but mandatory closure. These kinds of companies don't deserve to be in business. ...
9-3-2008 4:23 PM
debbyski
I agree with you RS. The problem is that we need attorney's cause you can't play in the ball game unless you know how to bat. For large cases like that you need an attorney. They took 33 percent and EXPENSES (which were very costly) and here was the kicker. The accident happened at work and worker's comp paid for the medical, and you are allowed to ask for those damages in the lawsuit. BUT, (and the attorney DID NOT disclose this until the day of settlement) you must pay that money back to the state. Our attorney said that he never tells his clients cause it "bums" them out. Now, an arbitrator wanted to give us 2/3 thirds and give our attorney's one third and drop the costs to the atto...
9-3-2008 4:38 PM
skwirlinator
While all of this is going on - what happened to a dr just doing the best for a patient? The first thing out of my dr mouth is "Specialist". Don't they have to be able to take samples and run tests themselves before they can do dr work?
I pay my co-pay BEFORE I am seen
I pay for car repairs after they are done.
If they are not done right - I don't pay and the job must be done right before I do.
$102 is quite a sum for taking someones vitals and writing a prescription. They ask me everytime what prescriptions I am taking, what I am allergic to and what is wrong with me - They have my records right in front of them. They look at them when they say my name - Hell they don't even know my name. B...
9-3-2008 4:41 PM
debbyski
I hear you Skwril. It's just craziness.
9-3-2008 8:06 PM
Jorjor
I think most doctors do want to do the best for their patients, but the decision rests with corporate bureaucrats. A friend whose husband had been treated since childhood for epilepsy suggested that as the cause of my symptoms; the husband agreed. I brought it up and discussed it with my doctor, who was overruled by a bean counter. Had I been tested and treated, a woman would not have been killed in an accident and I would have been spared a yearlong series of court hearings, loss of job and home, and narrowly escaping imprisonment on charges of vehicular homicide.

Sometimes these harebrained decisions, based solely on the bottom line, affect more than just the patient and immediate fami...
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
Embed This Clip In Your Site...

New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK