 masbury says: "constitutionally dubious legal proceeding" I get the impression that Bush wants to keep things volatile. Seems he is aching for violence so he can declare marshal law and rule until death. Yeah, sure. s/off. Forget Bush. The damage is done, the system is unbalanced and now it all rest on whomever lands on the WH. Welcome to the days of the benevolent dictatorships. Amen ratilfar Benevolent? The damage is done, the system is unbalanced and now it all rest on whomever lands on the WH.That's certainly part of it. But I think the other part is constant pressure on Congress to re-assert its role as a check to the executive branch. A groundswell of public opinion could force Congress to open impeachment hearings - not for political purposes, but constitutional ones. @TNCBT Just been sarcastic. We are at the tender mercies of whom ever holds the office these days. Which is not saying much. Right now the Republicans are all for this imbalance of power because they feel it protects them, that their leaders are "benevolent" to them, but the moment there is a Democrat in the W.H. they will howl about all the injustices real or imagine, even though the supported the very same measures they find themselves decrying. Thus it all boils down to getting your guy/gal in office. @Masbury Wish I could believe that, but so far the Dems in Congress don't seem to be move by it. I mean where are the investigations, the subpoenas and the impeachments. Pelosi said no ... |
View the Top Clips from February 12, 2008
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
|
|
|
