I played the "Battleground God" game and noticed something:

Qestion 7: It is justifiable to base one's beliefs about the external world on a
firm, inner conviction, regardless of the external evidence, or lack of
it, for the truth or falsity of these convictions.

contains for propositions at the same time: Justifiability of a belief in sth
1. regardless of the external evidence for its truth,
2. regardless of the external evidence for its falsity,
3. regardless of the lack of evidence for its truth,
4. regardless of the lack of evidence for its falsity.
Because
of point 2 I would answer FALSE (I could answer this question in the affirmative, only if I would agree with all 4 po...

I played the "Battleground God" game and noticed something:

Qestion 7: It is justifiable to base one's beliefs about the external world on a
firm, inner conviction, regardless of the external evidence, or lack of
it, for the truth or falsity of these convictions.

contains for propositions at the same time: Justifiability of a belief in sth
1. regardless of the external evidence for its truth,
2. regardless of the external evidence for its falsity,
3. regardless of the lack of evidence for its truth,
4. regardless of the lack of evidence for its falsity.
Because
of point 2 I would answer FALSE (I could answer this question in the affirmative, only if I would agree with all 4 points), since I do not think that it is justifiable to believe in
something for which there is evidence of its falsity. But I do
think that it is justifiable to believe in something for which there is
no evidence for neither its truth or its falsity (agree with 3. and 4.).

Question 17: It is justifiable to believe in God if one has a firm, inner conviction
that God exists, even if there is no external evidence that God exists.

only contains the proposition 3. from above for the particular belief in God (lack of evidence for its truth). So I could answer TRUE, without contradicting my previous answer (since I agreed with 3).

But one get a direct hit for answering Q7 with FALSE and Q17 with TRUE.
As far as I understand, this hit would be only justified, if Q7 would state:
"It is justifiable to base one's beliefs about the external world on a
firm, inner conviction, regardless of the lack of external evidence for the truth or falsity of these convictions."

Am I wrong?