Clipmarks
kalibrookefollowshare
6-2-2007 4:53 PM
1553 views
kalibrooke says:
oh my... they're at it again. now i believe that as long as they can provide for all of these children, it's their prerogative, but it's not like they are adopting needy children-- doesn't 17 BIOLOGICAL children border on selfish???
4 Comments   | Add a Comment
6-2-2007 5:07 PM
Heitz669
or crazy
6-2-2007 5:22 PM
kalibrooke
wow... jim duggar (known as jim bob) was in the arkansas house of representatives, though lost his subsequent bid for the senate.
i remember reading about their 16th pregnancy and thinking they were a little off...
(as an aside, i just found an article about it that i hadn't seen, though, for the skeptics to enjoy:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2005/10/19/notes101905.DTL)
6-2-2007 5:23 PM
skwirlinator
Older but not necessarily wiser
6-2-2007 6:31 PM
michellezm
Indeed Skwirl. (Just as an aside, my Afrikaans grandmother was one of 22 children but it was through one father and two wives (not polygamous). Afrikaaners were encourage to have large families in order to boost the white population of South Africa). I think it's thoughtless and selfish in this day and age when earth's resources are drying up.
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
Embed This Clip In Your Site...

New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK