Another association - Rashid Khalidi, an internationally known scholar, critic of Israel. He probably just "lives in the neighborhood".

It took you 6 months to post this?

BTW, come to think of it rationally, the Palestine is not enemy of United States, so your headline doesn't seem to be "helping". How about this "Obama - a friend of Muslims and Terrorists"?

SO WHAT?

/river newman/

Obama - a friend of the world and the world of him - will be elected president of the United States of America in one week.

This information is right up-to-date and barring an assassins bullet is a foregone conclusion. So get on side and vote for the Black man. You'll feel better and have bragging rights for 4 years!

The alternative is the pseudo-hero who crashes plains and is a dunce.

I see nothing wrong with being a "critic of Israel". It has the longest continuous record of war crimes and crimes against humanity in modern existence.

Boy there are some sick people in this audience... ratcatcher2 - get a dictionary, perhaps then you can spew in style and look a bit more intelligent... although the content would probably give you away.

@arifsali, if I wanted your opinion on what to call what - I'd ask. Since I didn't - it's pretty useless, not to mention... ah, nevermind, I said 'not to mention'...

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/10/30/fact-check-does-group-mccain-chairs-have-link-to-columbia-professor-khalidi/

The title implies that there is something wrong with that.

Rsage, is russian your first language?

It is.

@ratiflar

The title implies that there is something wrong with that.

There is because the evening was not just pro-palestinian, but anti-Israeli.

@Rsage

look a bit more intelligent ...

Judging a book by the cover, are you? I take it that you are still supporting the intellectually challenged Navy dunce. Birds of a feather flock together. Of course what might not help you either, my Russian friend, is that...
Fundamentalist Religion males you stupid.

Whether the man's intellectually challenged is debatable, although considering what the man has been through and your comment on the subject - you certainly shine as a beacon of a very small person.

For the record - I'm NOT your 'Russian friend' and not sure why you threw that silly link in the mix... I guess you're trying to imply that I'm religious, which I'm not in a biblical definition of the term.

I guess you're trying to imply that I'm religious, which I'm not in a biblical definition of the term.

Have another guess my Ruskie friend. Remember that religion is for today or tomorrow but stupid is forever.

No self-criticism is necessary on your part... I pretty much figured you out already.

Well you still have some wit. No substitute for intelligence but with the earth-shattering loss of your leader on earth, maybe now you might regain some use of your under utilised brain. No?

Well, since you don't seem to show either - I guess I'm one up on that one. "earth-shattering loss of your leader" - where did you come up with this non-sense? There is nothing of the kind. FYI, if you can still think somewhat - there were elections held in the US and Barack Obama won. That's the end of the sentence. It wasn't unexpected, it wasn't shocking, it was historical, I'll certainly agree there, but as for the leader - he'll be the new leader of the USA, which is my country and I'll support the man if he does right by the USA. Kapish?

he'll be the new leader of the USA, which is my country and I'll support the man if he does right by the USA. Kapish?

Woh! Conditional support!!! On your terms? Based on your very doubtful judgement?

Was your support for Le Duce, private Bush, also conditional? Doubt it. Did the emperor-with-no-clothes hence privates, measure up to your "doing right by the USA", do you reckon? Did you have to adjust the bar or your standards down a lot? Touching dirt? Oh, shit.

He did some things well, others not so well. My support is conditional for everyone. As for the terms - whatever they are - they are mine and there's absolutely nothing you can say why you your judgment and support conditions are any more relevant than mine.

There's no 'bar' and nothing was 'touched'. It doesn't work like that for my purposes.

My guess is you're in complete and full support of Obama, would that be a correct guess?

Name 3 that he did well.

So for you Bush was not the worst president in living memory, maybe all time? Should any store be allowed to your opinion and the other 10 that agree with you? Is it only chaff that is left to amuse us?

Your guess on my support now for Obama is wrong. He might yet prove a bigger Antichrist than Bush!!! Efforts to be whiter than white may be his undoing.

We didn't get attacked since 9/11, he did some good stuff with AIDS in Africa, his economic plan post 9/11 managed to recover the economy relatively quickly, considering what happened.

No, Carter was much worse in my opinion.

So, if you're such a staunch anti-Bush guy and you don't support Obama - sounds like you have no President, do you?

We didn't get attacked since 9/11,

Have you used this line often? Realize that you didn't get attacked BEFORE 9/11 either and you might realise how silly that your point is.

There is even a logic that because it was Bush that there was a 9/11!!! I'll let you ponder that rather than do your thinking for you. One big new idea like 'before 9/11' is enough for your under used brain for now. Ha ha.

My mistake, I thought you were from this continent... since you're not - the rest becomes pretty irrelevant...