Once again he's hit the ball out of the park with this great article proving that Soros' comments, and those of others, are based on lies.

Within Horowitz's words is the point that debate should focus upon ideas as they are actually presented, and implicitly from his exposition one can read that one can 'read off' from them the values behind these ideas. Having laid out a first point in burning off the clouds of emotive rhetoric - with delicious (and, I hope conscious. irony!), I look forward to Horowitz's providing those who study his ideas with more advice on the basics of intellectual debate so we can welcome their expositions and discussions as contributions to the development of our understanding.

The delicious irony of campus thought police trying to suppress Islamo-Facist awareness has been very interesting. La Raza (racist Mexicans) - come right in! Apologists for terrorists - come right in! Socialist Venezuelan dictators - always welcome!

Someone who might point out that there are organized groups of people in the world who want to kill us and overthrow our entire way of life - bigoted, idiots who must be shouted down.

"Racist Mexicans"... Nice.

Anyway, yes, I agree... Some folks want to get all touchy-feely with terrorists. What's all that about? They would cut off the hand of the very person who would hand them an olive wreath! You can't reason with that... You just can't.

Or can you?