Big disappointment but no shock here. He is a demorepublicratan after all.
They are all one (ruling) party in the end.

They are all ruled by that Bilderberg mob. All members stick together.

I don't know about the conspiracy theories or the tri-lateral commisions but I do know that the Founders wrote the Constitution knowing full well that once a branch grabs certain powers it simply won't let them go regardless of who is in power.

Thank you G.W.B.!

I agree ratilfar. I think the balancing of the branches of power is one of the most important aspects of the Constitution.

I, for one, don't understand why there is ever allowed to be an imbalance of power. If we have to have this retarded two party system then the least we should do is put into law a balance of power that is constant. There should always be an exact equal amount of voting power on both sides in Washington. That way one side never gets an advantage by numbers alone. Then these bozos in charge would have to actually make good, well thought out points in order to get something done instead of making power plays on their numbers alone.

The law is called the Constitution of the United States of America.

The Constitution does not force a balance of power between the two ruling political parties.

The reason I didn't vote for him, he's a Trojan horse. The overlords put him up as an appeaser to allow their plan to go forward while the people looked the other way. Anyone who's paying attention knows that one branch can't deliver all he promised, only work together toward that goal with the others. Look at all the ass-faced clowns still in congress to see the failure of the Obama ideal of transforming America in the interest of the people, and the failure of the people to understand that it takes much more energy to hold a course of freedom than that of pulling a voting lever.

The problem is not the balance between the parties but between the Branches.