The first question that comes to mind is why would the judge need the computer as evidence? The object of the suit is what was written on her blog and the judge can certainly access that bit of evidence from any computer.

The second and most pressing question is why was Harrington brought before a judge in the first place? It is an obvious First Amendment violation for charges to be brought against her for voicing her opinion.

I am reminded of Bill O’Reilly exercising his First Amendment right (to the point of abuse) to spew his hatred toward Dr Tillman that lead to his murder. Ms. Harrington’s remarks did not lead to a murder. I don’t see O’Reilly being hauled into court. Is this a case of double standard?

The author insinuates that Smith’s pending inheritance has something to do with this. I don’t think it does unless the judge stands to collect some of it. In which case he should recuse himself. Either way he his abusing his power by allowing Harrington to be brought before