 merrie says: Addendum: Truly, this man wanted the spotlight instead of sending the message, given is lame excuse: But Mr Obama did not want to “spoil the image of success” of his disarmament session, which passed a resolution to work towards a nuclear-free world and a host of measures designed to control the spread of nuclear weapons and reduce existing stocks.How could challenging Iran’s hidden nuclear facilities collide with his image of fighting the spread of nuclear weapons? The two dovetail nicely, and he would have picked up the respect of the hard liners here and abroad. Clearly, this presidency is all about ‘me’ (the imperial ‘me’ of course). And I thought Clinton was self absorbed. It reads "image of success" rather than "image of HIS success". Obviously the fine distinction is lost on your mediocre intellect. Anyway..what do you suggest the US government do to Iran? Threaten to bomb them and then go ahead. Right. That worked really well in Iraq and Afghanistan. Remember that the US is the only country to have dropped a nuclear bomb..twice. The US has 8,000 operational warheads and approximately 2,000 on high alert. Israel has 150 or more nuclear warheads. Who am I most scared of? Guess. "image of success" meaning HIS speech at the UN Security Council..... How could challenging Iran’s hidden nuclear facilities collide with his image of fighting the spread of nuclear weapons? The two dovetail nicely, and he would have picked up the respect of the hard liners here and abroad. Clearly, this presidency is all about ‘me’ (the imperial ‘me’ of course). Obama's French Lesson Confusing ends and means, the Obama administration strives mightily for shows of allied unity, good feeling, and pious concern about Iran’s nuclear program " whereas the real objective is stopping that program. This feel-good posturi[b]... |
View the Top Clips from October 4, 2009
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
|
New from the makers of Clipmarks: Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!
|
||||||
