Is War With Iran Imminent?


	Is War With Iran Imminent?

Geshizar

4-28-2008 10:02 PM

262 views

tags:

not my kids, iraq, iran, inept leaders, military, war on terror

Geshizar says:

I guess we will just have to activate the Boy and Girl Scouts. Regular troops are getting a tad bit thin.

Add a Comment

Login to Comment. Not a member yet? Sign up

View the Top Clips from April 28, 2008

Embed This Clip In Your Site...

<div style="margin: 12px 0px; font-family: arial; color: #333333; background: #ffffff; border: solid 4px #e5e5e5; width: 100%; clear: left;"><div class="CM_CTB_Content_Wrap" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;background-color: #ffffff;"><div style="border-bottom: solid 1px #dcdcdc; white-space: nowrap; margin-bottom: 8px; background-color: #eeeeee ;background-image: url(http://clipmarks.com/images/source-bg.gif); background-repeat: repeat-x; height: 24px; line-height: 24px; vertical-align: middle; padding-bottom: 4px; color: #666666; font-size: 10px;" ><a href="http://clipmarks.com/clip-to-blog/" title="see clips that are hot right now"><img src="http://content.clipmarks.com/blog_embed/00341a76-8c5f-4854-b0a5-d44a2f652609/55A327E7-6DF6-4162-A303-54A2A9C003E1/" alt="" width="19" height="19" border="0" style="vertical-align: middle; margin: 0px 4px; display: inline; border: none; float:none;" /></a>clipped from <a title="http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=12755" href="http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=12755" style="font-size: 11px;">www.antiwar.com</a></div><blockquote style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;" cite="http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=12755"><P><FONT size="7"><B>T</B></FONT>he shooting has already <A href="http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSWAT00939920080425">started</A> 
  in the Persian Gulf – and chances are we'll be at war with Iran before President 
  Bush's term is up. An American ship under contract with the U.S. Navy – the 
  <I>Western Venture</I> – claims it was in international waters when Iranian 
  speedboats approached and failed to answer radio calls. Shots were fired on 
  the American side. Iran denies the whole thing. Yet you'll recall that in <A href="http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=10774">the 
  last incident</A>, involving the capture of British sailors, the story about 
  being in international waters was the same – except, it turns out, they weren't 
  in international waters, but in <A href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article3768243.ece">disputed 
  waters</A>, just as we speculated in <A href="http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=10724">this 
  space</A>. There's no reason to expect anything different this time. Clearly, 
  the U.S. and Britain are trying to trigger a new conflict with the most brazen 
  provocations, and they don't really care how it happens – only that it does. 
</P></blockquote></div><div style="margin: 0px 6px 6px 4px;"><table style="font-size: 11px;border-spacing: 0px;padding: 0px;" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tr><td style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;">&nbsp;</td><td align="right" style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;width:107px" width="107"><a href="http://clipmarks.com/share/55A327E7-6DF6-4162-A303-54A2A9C003E1/blog/" title="blog or email this clip"><img src="http://content7.clipmarks.com/images/c2b-foot.png" border="0" alt="blog it" width="107" height="17" style="border-width:0px;padding:0px;margin:0px;" /></a></td></tr></table></div></div>