 masbury says: Divided evenly on increasing debt to stimulate economy The editors of the NYT should be required to pay higher taxes, no question about it. The pendulum will swing too far. Think so? Obama's only after 39% top marginal rate, still the 3rd lowest in post-WW2 history, and only a handful of points above where it is now. It's a pretty moderate change. 74% ????! Wow - 26% of the US citizens are rich! Probably not - there's a huge number of middle-class folks who've bought the industrial propaganda and have honestly come to believe that taxing the rich results in long-term economic decline. There's no research that supports the idea, though; if anything, the opposite. Think so? Obama's only after 39% top marginal rate...Not so much the Obama plan, but the large percentage of people generally pissed off suggest momentum in that direction. Could be. Thanks for comment masbury! But the contrary is supported in some industries! If the real rich gets enough money to upgrade his factory, he will install a full-electronic-aggregate, that makes the work of 100 workers and need only 3 for watching it. One for each 8 hours period a day. 97 are unemployed and despaired and the finance office the same: 97 pers. won't pay taxes anymore and the owner of all don't for the next 3 years not pay a pence too for upgrading the factory. In the case, he don't produce weapons or any other military sensible goods, he will take the next step 5 till 8 years later and begin the "outsourcing" of the production. So the last 3 people lost their jobs too and ne... |
View the Top Clips from April 7, 2009
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
|
|
|
|
New from the makers of Clipmarks: Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!
|
|
