Clipmarks
jatflafollowshare
7-9-2009 10:50 AM
138 views
jatfla says:
Does this sound familiar to those who know their Bibles?
7 Comments   | Add a Comment
7-9-2009 11:34 AM
masbury
Or to those who know the 19th/20th-century modern dispensationalist view of their Bibles, not shared by any ancient writer?
7-9-2009 1:06 PM
jatfla
I think John, Peter, Daniel, Matthew, etc....were pretty ancient writers.

If ones view is Preterist then this won't appeal to them.
7-9-2009 6:06 PM
Antara
http://catholic-caveman.blogspot.com/2009/07/prophetic-confiteor-it-took-less-that.html


One comment on this I heartily agree with:

"this particular encyclical should be read in it's entirety before comments are made"
7-9-2009 6:13 PM
jatfla
Is this some of what you were referring to?:

"Pullella speculated that “the pope appeared to back government intervention ‘in correcting errors and malfunctions’ in the economy, saying ‘one could foresee an increase in the new forms of political participation, nationally and internationally.’” But this “government intervention” would not go so far to the level of a micromanaging/centrally-planning regime, if one goes by the pontiff’s own words in the encyclical."
7-9-2009 6:41 PM
Antara
huh? he hi-lighted that paragraph to illustrate the author's ignorance in "speculating".

This pope is a philosopher and a theologian, he can be expected to have penned something (i hope, lol) a little deeper than the average bear....I feel this blogger asking that people give the whole document a read before commenting on mere parts of it, is a fair request really.

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.html

Ps: I haven't read it yet, but am starting it tonight.
7-12-2009 4:36 PM
mseadickson
Hmm...it sure does!
7-13-2009 5:01 PM
Efrain Alvarado
"this particular encyclical should be read in it's entirety before comments are made"
Caritas in Veritate p. 42:

"Despite some of its structural elements, which should neither be denied nor exaggerated, “globalization, a priori, is neither good nor bad. It will be what people make of it”. We should not be its victims, but rather its protagonists, acting in the light of reason, guided by charity and truth. Blind opposition would be a mistaken and prejudiced attitude, incapable of recognizing the positive aspects of the process, with the consequent risk of missing the chance to take advantage of its many opportunities for development. The processes of globalization, suitably u...
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
Embed This Clip In Your Site...

New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK