Cli Nto N | Clipmarks


	Cli Nto N

n2sooners

11-18-2007 12:51 AM

216 views

tags:

clinton, cnn, media, msm, bias, election, debate, campaign, politics

n2sooners says:

No wonder the dems would rather debate on stations like CNN and MSNBC, they might actually have to answer tough questions in a FOX debate.

1 Comment |

Add a Comment

11-18-2007 2:20 PM

topsailangler

Didn't the democrats say they wanted transparency and integrity restored to our government? Guess that was before they won a majority in congress.

Login to Comment. Not a member yet? Sign up

View the Top Clips from November 18, 2007

Embed This Clip In Your Site...

<div style="margin: 12px 0px; font-family: arial; color: #333333; background: #ffffff; border: solid 4px #e5e5e5; width: 100%; clear: left;"><div class="CM_CTB_Content_Wrap" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;background-color: #ffffff;"><div style="border-bottom: solid 1px #dcdcdc; white-space: nowrap; margin-bottom: 8px; background-color: #eeeeee ;background-image: url(http://clipmarks.com/images/source-bg.gif); background-repeat: repeat-x; height: 24px; line-height: 24px; vertical-align: middle; padding-bottom: 4px; color: #666666; font-size: 10px;" ><a href="http://clipmarks.com/clip-to-blog/" title="see clips that are hot right now"><img src="http://content.clipmarks.com/blog_embed/f75c61bd-2a56-4218-ae47-15dc8d739e79/50B01F48-426B-496F-BA6F-34C243CE5291/" alt="" width="19" height="19" border="0" style="vertical-align: middle; margin: 0px 4px; display: inline; border: none; float:none;" /></a>clipped from <a title="http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/190159.php" href="http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/190159.php" style="font-size: 11px;">mypetjawa.mu.nu</a></div><blockquote style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;" cite="http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/190159.php"><H3 class="title">CNN Rigged Democrat Debate: The Evidence Mounts</H3></blockquote><div style="height: 2px; font-size: 2px; background: #dcdcdc; border-bottom: solid 1px #f5f5f5; margin: 2px 4px;"></div><blockquote style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;" cite="http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/190159.php"><P><A href="http://pcexposed.blogspot.com/2007/11/cnn-goes-green-by-gardening-plants.html" linkindex="9" set="yes">Four plants made by CNN, who are stepping forward to claim that CNN screened them and made sure they asked what CNN wanted them to.</A> Also, the post-debate analysis had <A href="http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2007/11/who-is-cnn-kidd.html" linkindex="10">two former Clinton staffers and James Carville</A> praising Hillary's performance as the most flawless thing ever witnessed.</P></blockquote><div style="height: 2px; font-size: 2px; background: #dcdcdc; border-bottom: solid 1px #f5f5f5; margin: 2px 4px;"></div><blockquote style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;" cite="http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/190159.php"><P>Sorry - <A href="http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2007/11/cnn-plants-questions-to-protect-hillary.html" linkindex="11">all SIX plants </A>were Democrat supporters, former staffers or politicos.</P></blockquote><div style="height: 2px; font-size: 2px; background: #dcdcdc; border-bottom: solid 1px #f5f5f5; margin: 2px 4px;"></div><blockquote style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;" cite="http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/190159.php"><P>Even <A href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/16/questions-about-carville-begala-and-cnn/index.html?hp" linkindex="12">the KOSBOTS noticed</A> the failed attempt to portray the plants and analysts as "undecided voters."  </P></blockquote><div style="height: 2px; font-size: 2px; background: #dcdcdc; border-bottom: solid 1px #f5f5f5; margin: 2px 4px;"></div><blockquote style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;" cite="http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/190159.php"><P>PATHETIC, and with potentially disturbing implications. Here we have a major, supposedly "objective" news network actively colluding with the Democrat Party to create in the public consciousness a false and staged image of the political candidates in that party to make them look better than they really are.</P></blockquote></div><div style="margin: 0px 6px 6px 4px;"><table style="font-size: 11px;border-spacing: 0px;padding: 0px;" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tr><td style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;">&nbsp;</td><td align="right" style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;width:107px" width="107"><a href="http://clipmarks.com/share/50B01F48-426B-496F-BA6F-34C243CE5291/blog/" title="blog or email this clip"><img src="http://content7.clipmarks.com/images/c2b-foot.png" border="0" alt="blog it" width="107" height="17" style="border-width:0px;padding:0px;margin:0px;" /></a></td></tr></table></div></div>