Clipmarks
   
  
   
willhelmfollowshare
11-3-2008 10:47 PM
545 views
64 Comments   | Add a Comment
11-3-2008 11:42 PM
rvnurse2b
I head there was a nuke there too, and put 2 & 2 together myself...unbelievable
11-4-2008 7:02 AM
merrie
It didn't make any sense to conduct a underground nuclear test so
close to their coast, but according to this report this was their rationale:

The geographical location of the test has several advantages. It is exposed to significant seismic activity, which could serve to mask nuclear tests; it is believed to be close to Iran's nuclear development facility; delivery and transport of material and personnel can be effected easily through the Hormuz Strait; and Iranian enemies would hesitate to bomb the area because that would threaten the flow of a substantial percentage of the world's oil.

[url=http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=26.704%C2%B0N,+55.016%C2%B0E&ie=UTF8&ll=26.70421...
11-4-2008 10:35 AM
The REAL Napster
Even if it was an undergraound test, can't remote sensing equipment eventually pick up the radioactive trace? It may take alot longer but I thought it was possible.
11-4-2008 5:08 PM
ratcatcher2
OMG!
11-4-2008 5:30 PM
earnric
Do I like the fact that Iranian nut-cases are working on the bomb -- no. But lets get real...

The Pakistani's have the bomb: their intelligence service is far more closely aligned with al-qada and the Taliban than with western interests... The father of their nuclear program is a known proliferator... [But our (current) government doesn't raise the alarm so conservatives aren't all up in arms... They talk about Iran, so like good lap-dogs, we bark.]

N. Korea has the bomb ...
India has the bomb ...
Former USSR states have nuclear material and can possibly be in a position to sell it to terrorists to create a dirty bomb.

Folks - the nuke genie is out of the bag... We're in a MAD scenario....
11-4-2008 5:31 PM
earnric
...nuclear material that's out there in the former soviet states.

(got cut off)
11-5-2008 3:14 PM
RecordSage
earnric - you don't take into account the fact that Russians are rational and islamic jihaidsts are NOT! they don't understand the concept of MAD, although they are mad.
11-6-2008 8:13 AM
ratcatcher2
Israel doesn't know if it has nukes or not, officially.
11-6-2008 11:30 PM
RecordSage
That's your opinion on the subject, which is pretty meaningless with all due respect.
11-7-2008 1:14 AM
ratcatcher2
Haven't you heard? Bush is in hiding and everyone's opinion now counts again even the Ruskies'. Ha ha

On your use of english.
That's your opinion on the subject, which is pretty meaningless with all due respect.
The use of " all due respect" is meaningless here and counter to "your opinion on the subject". It's like the double negative. Here it could be interpretated as giving respected when we know that the opposite is your intention.

I'm sure you are delighted with my pointing this out to you. Just be sure in the future to stay within your limited abilities with your second language and you'll be OK. OK Ruskie?
11-7-2008 3:23 AM
RecordSage
However bad my English might be, it's certainly better than your Russian. btw, what is 'Ruskie'? I don't believe such word exists in either Webster's nor any Russian dictionaries... Try looking in the mirror prior to putting your foot in your... well, you can finish the sentence...
11-7-2008 4:41 AM
darkeforce
How convenient. The Israelis have decided to say that Iran has nuclear weapons now, even though all evidence says they don't. This gives them the national excuse to build up the IMF in preparation for this so-called "imminent attack".

Meanwhile, pay no attention to the very accurate intelligence that says Israel is preparing to invade Lebanon; a sovereign nation, once more, with only flimsy excuses as justification.

It's time for somebody to say "No" to this Spoiled Brat nation, once and for all.
11-7-2008 2:23 PM
RecordSage
As long as you can GUARANTEE that there's no threat - I'd agree with you. I highly doubt that you can. Israel has no motive to simply attack those nations. Your intelligence might not be as up to date as theirs.
11-7-2008 5:50 PM
darkeforce
Iran has the eyes of the world on their nuclear program. If they had developed nuclear weapons, someone would have noticed by now.

As for Israel's motives; they'll just claim they're after Hezbollah, the same as they did the last time they invaded Lebanon. However, Israel is best served by the Arab and Persian countries around them being in disarray. That makes the rest of the world watch those countries closer, aiding Israel in watching for terrorist activity.

The problem is, that in the eyes of much of the Western world, Israel can do no wrong, so it isn't being watched or penalized for it's childish and aggressive behavior.
11-8-2008 3:26 AM
RecordSage
Well, in the eyes of UN nations - Israel can do no right. As for intelligence - I think the Israelis have a better handle there than just about anybody else. If they wanted to attack Lebanon just because - they would've done it, way before all those Syrian missiles were delivered there, under the nose of UN troops I might add. The Lebanon invasion was due to attack by hezbollah that killed and kidnapped Israeli soldiers.

As for Iran being noticed - they kicked the watchers out, so having underground facilities makes it kind of hard to 'notice' too much. Also keep in mind that it was Iran who wants to wipe Israel off the map, not the other way around.

The suicide bombers blow up in Isra...
11-8-2008 4:38 AM
darkeforce
The UN bends over backwards for Israel. What UN are you talking about? As for the timing, those missiles are an added justification for their already-planned invasion. Lebanon is like Iraq to Bush; they did nothing wrong, but Israel has it in their head that they want to invade it, anyway; for the sake of demonstrating power. As for rescuing soldier, they lost 40 times as many soldiers than were originally kidnapped. That kind of math doesn't work anywhere, especially not when we're talking about human lives.

Iran, for your information, is cooperating with the watchers, so that point is moot.

Also keep in mind that it was Iran who wants to wipe Israel off the map, not the other way ...
11-8-2008 2:04 PM
RecordSage
I would agree with you, slightly, about both sides having things to answer for. Israelis aren't bullys, they're simply better at warfare, or used to be before they started dropping the stupid leaflets pointing out to where the bombs will fall.

But where your assessment fails, at least in my view, is in the tactics used. The deal with Iran is bologna, Israel has no interest in wiping out Iran as a country, unless they develop the nukes and do as THEY (i.e. Iran) vocally stated, a number of times and in public. You seem to be dismissing that point.

The reason I think you're wrong is in the approach itself. All palestinians need to do is go over to UN and say "we drop the terrorism gig ...
11-8-2008 6:48 PM
darkeforce
I'm afraid your assessment falls completely apart. One, the Israelis are very much bullies. They react with a disproportionate amount of force to individuals (Not Palestinians as a whole) taking potshots at them, and end up killing innocent Palestinians who most likely just want peace themselves. Those they don't kill, they destroy the homes and livelihoods of. That is the very definition of bullies.

The issue with Iran is very real. Iran talks about destroying Israel, but only because Israel has become a dark, disruptive force in the Middle East. What worries me more is that Israel is very quiet officially about wanting to destroy Iran, but intelligence coming out of there says very clearl...
11-9-2008 3:56 AM
RecordSage
Did you see dancing on the streets on 9/11 there? Or those were also 'individuals'. Come on, you're being totally dishonest about how many of those people are militant. It's way more than 'individuals'.

Bullies are entities that originate attacks. One needs not be a rocket scientist to see that Israel constantly retaliates. If the palestinians did drop the terrorism bit - things would turn dramatically better for them and Israel's hands would be tied, but they do NOT. I clipped an article not long ago about an 18-year old girl, who just got married and is getting ready for the old trip upstairs after pulling the cord in Israel. Listen to what she had to say. Watch the movie Obsession,...
11-9-2008 4:37 AM
RecordSage
Here's today's news. If they can't even talk to their own, heck, if they are willing to kill their own - what can anyone else expect.
11-9-2008 5:04 AM
ratcatcher2
One needs not be a rocket scientist to see that Israel constantly retaliates. If the ...
You are joking, aren't you? You cannot seriously believe these Zionist mantras, one being the 'empty land' myth and another the UN constantly picking on the terrorist state of Israel.

Are you a Zionist?
11-9-2008 7:42 AM
darkeforce
Did you see dancing on the streets on 9/11 there? Or those were also 'individuals'. Come on, you're being totally dishonest about how many of those people are militant. It's way more than 'individuals'.
It suits your narrow view that you would see that event out of context. What those people know of America is that it gives Israel money and weapons in order that they can better kill their people, steal their land and destroy their homes and businesses. What other way can they see the US other than as pure evil? To their perspective, the Americans are equally responsible as Israel for destroying the Palestinian way of life. America is funding a foreign army to invade their lan...
11-9-2008 6:41 PM
RecordSage
And after this, you're calling my view 'narrow'? Look in the mirror, read some history books... going way back, in terms of who had the land etc. palestinians were getting plenty of money from the same 'evil' America when they would even consider talking about peace. America made countless efforts to make peace in the region. America restrained Israel countless times from attacking. You can make a museum exhibit with all of the US Presidents and arafat. These people simply do not want peace. America's leaders and people like you are justifying terrorism with all kinds of rhetoric, thinking they want to live peacefully. I've seen more than enough examples of that not being so and perso...
11-9-2008 8:30 PM
darkeforce
Yeah, yeah. Tell it to the Crusaders. The Western world has a long history of meddling in the Middle East. That doesn't make any of it right. It would hardly be the first time that the United States played both sides against the middle. But the fact of the matter is that the US is allowing Israel to be an oppressor of the Palestinian people. And people like you are justifying apartheid with your rhetoric, claiming that God himself placed the Israelis there.

Israel made it not pretty for Israel. They took a questionable action by the British Empire in creating their nation, and turned the rightful indigenous people of that land into second-class citizens; people that it was okay to kill, to ...
11-9-2008 8:42 PM
ratcatcher2
America restrained Israel countless times from attacking.
@RecordSage How did you make that slip? You are supposed to keep up the pretence that the Zionists are not the aggressors, didn't you know. You'll get fired out of the club and have ADL suing you.
11-9-2008 9:31 PM
RecordSage
I don't 'pretend' anything. These are facts, unfortunate, but true. And it was always in retaliation for some sort of terrorist attack, so quit the 'aggressor' BS. If Israel wanted to be aggressor - there would be nobody left to be aggressive about, if one considers their military strength and brain power.
11-10-2008 9:05 AM
ratcatcher2
Again
You are supposed to keep up the pretence that the Zionists are not the aggressors, didn't you know.
... and no more pretending or emotion without supporting sources.

Can we deal with the Zionist last incursion into Lebanon in 2006 until they had their cowardly asses whipped by the brave Hizbollah? Now can with have quotes from reputable sources and not crybaby emotion, please?
11-10-2008 1:39 PM
RecordSage
Give me a break. Cowards hiding weapons in hospitals, in apartment buildings, you call that 'brave'. If they were brave, they'd get their weapons and come out and fight like men, not cowards that they are. No question the Israelis did a miserable job, but it had nothing to do with 'bravery' on the other side. If you think somehow the two forces can be compared, in terms of weapons and capabilities - there are plenty of doctors who can examine the old noggin for ya. There's no emotion, it's just your head must be in who knows what clouds to make a comment like that.
11-10-2008 7:05 PM
ratcatcher2
Again
Now can with have quotes from reputable sources and not crybaby emotion, please?
As I forecasted, no quotes from you from reputable source.

I have plenty of them unless if you don't.
11-11-2008 12:32 AM
RecordSage
I have my source, whether you approve of them or not isn't relevant. It doesn't change the situation. If you put ideology aside and look at the two sides - it's not that difficult to see what is what, who screwed up and why. If you want to be an ideologue about it to stroke your whatever - that's obviously up to you, but that doesn't change the reality and the facts on the ground. Olmert was a big mistake, if Netanyahu becomes the next PM - we'll see how 'brave' your characters will be. The question is if the Israelis are smart enough to pick the right leader or not... that's yet to be determined, but that's also getting a little off topic.
11-11-2008 2:33 AM
darkeforce
That's the whole point. I'm not[b] an idealogue. I have no prejudice or favouritism toward either country, and looking at the situation objectively shows me that they're both in the wrong, but Israel is acting worse, and it's entirely in Israel's power to end this stand off. The Palestinians don't have the power to stop it. They don't have an organized government, capable of dealing with those criminals in their rapidly-shrinking country who are lashing out desperately at their oppressor. Israel just has to stop taking land away from the Palestinians; open the blockades and end the embargos. Give back the land they have taken since the 1969 war.

The problem with your viewpoint is [b]...
11-11-2008 2:49 AM
RecordSage
Well, it's cute that you claim to be impartial, but when one talks about 'palestinians' against the 'criminals' - it's more than evident that you're not.

I have first-hand accounts of what's going on there and what palestinians are and aren't doing. I don't have the attitude that Israel is holy at all... I'm just 100% totally against terrorism as a means to an end. If the palestinians did end this idiotic approach to trying to resolve their problems - THAT would bring the end to this conflict.
11-11-2008 3:06 AM
darkeforce
No. You need to read better. The criminals are the terrorists in Palestine. They are not representatives of Palestine as a whole, as you seem to think they are. They are individuals, breaking the law.

And I'll wager you only know what's going on there according to Israelis, and what they're being told by the Israeli authorities and media. Considering the huge bias you show, you obviously don't have similar contact with the Palestinians.

So yes, I'm impartial. You need to realize that you aren't.
11-11-2008 5:39 AM
RecordSage
So yes, I'm impartial. You need to realize that you aren't.
Right, I could make the exact same statement, although it would be just as inaccurate as yours.

I don't have inside into palestinian side, that is true... but as I stated before - sending one's kids to blow themselves up in some mall will never draw any sympathy from me. It's as simple as that. Being a parent - I can't even fathom how these people can lower themselves to such level.

If you look at the stats of when they had truce - who usually restarts the reciprocal cycle of violence? How many times has arafat broken his word? Do you see Israelis disagreeing within themselves? OMG, with 40+ parties, it's unrea...
11-11-2008 6:21 PM
darkeforce
American parents can't control their kids any better than Palestinians parents can control theirs. Look at what happens in America when kids are raised in substandard conditions. They form criminal gangs. The same thing happens in Palestine; the only difference is that the entire country has substandard conditions. The difference is that American youth gangs only have vague ideas of the source of their misery. In Palestine, they know exactly what the source of their misery is; they come invading; killing people, and bulldozing homes regularly. Add to that fact that a handful of charismatic people are feeding these kids violent rhetoric, and promises of glory and reward for self-sacrifice, an...
11-11-2008 8:50 PM
ratcatcher2
Olmert was a big mistake, if Netanyahu becomes the next PM - we'll see how 'brave' your characters will be. The question is if the Israelis are smart enough to pick the right leader or not... t
... and Rabin???

Rabin's assassination

Was Rabin a Traitor, deserving Death?
11-11-2008 8:57 PM
ratcatcher2
I'm just 100% totally against terrorism as a means to an end.
Many states start with what might now be classified as terrorism, including the United States. Virtually all states put it behind them, except Israel. It was was born of terrorism. Many of its Prime Ministers were terrorists. It practices terrorism today on a grand scale. Murdering innocent women and children is a perfectly acceptable method of forcing its will on others.
11-11-2008 9:04 PM
ratcatcher2
I have first-hand accounts of what's going on there
Bullshite!

So you are a Zionist Jew?? And your loyalties are clear for all to see. And your secret source? Might you ever quote any source to back up your totally emotional rants. Or is there special dispensation for you as a member of the victim fraternity? Will you put the ADL on to us for telling the truth?
11-12-2008 3:22 AM
RecordSage
I don't have any 'secret sources', I just know some people who came from there and have first-hand accounts, that's all. I don't do 'emotional rants' - I'm not big on 'emotion', much more into 'logic'. I'm NOT a victim, although have dealt with some racism in the old country and certainly have family members have suffered from such.

As for your 'truth' - you can shove it. It's nothing more than ideological blither. As Jack once pointed out - 'you can't handle the truth', since it rubs against your ideology.
11-12-2008 4:44 AM
darkeforce
What you have are biased, one-sided sources, and if you claim that you deal in logic, then it's only logical that you get equivalent information from the other side of the argument. When you see both sides together, then you will see the truth.

Until then, what you have now is nothing but propaganda. It seems that you're the one who can't handle the truth, because you're pushing a lot of denial here.
11-12-2008 2:21 PM
RecordSage
I could say the same thing about you, just on the other side.

It's not so much 'bias', as some of the conversations of the people from there, granted from one side and I'm weighing it as such, and my total, utter & complete disbelief in terrorism as a means to make a point. That's all. It is logic. There's NOTHING you or anyone else can tell me that would justify terrorism or sending your own kids to die. That's why I DON'T care about what the other side says, if they continue with terrorism.
11-12-2008 4:42 PM
ratcatcher2
I'm prepared to back up my opinion with sources. You are not, relying on 'secret' sources. As I said already ...
So you are a Zionist Jew?? And your loyalties are clear for all to see. And your secret source? Might you ever quote any source to back up your totally emotional rants. Or is there special dispensation for you as a member of the victim fraternity? Will you put the ADL on to us for telling the truth.
As you didn't deny then I've repeated.

You can give up anytime.
11-12-2008 5:29 PM
JoelC
ratcatcher2
(or shall we just call you righthand)
Go crawl back under your rock and stay there this time. You didn't learn your lesson the first time, maybe you will this time.
11-12-2008 5:52 PM
RecordSage
Your sources don't mean any more than my sources. What I've stated (about them being terrorists) is true, regardless of what your sources say. It's doesn't take a rocket scientist to see what's what. You think you can take the posture of ah-I-need-a-bomb and make some points. You're just as useless and meaningless as he is - a little man with a little man syndrome. I don't know what your physical size is, but in case you didn't get it - I was referring to your physical size here.
11-12-2008 9:19 PM
darkeforce
RecordSage said:

I could say the same thing about you, just on the other side.
No, you can't. I have no connections on either side of the issue. I am unbiased, and from that perspective, the Israelis are causing the lion's share of the problems.

You won't face the reality of your bias, and are projecting it on to others, accusing them of bias when they are just giving you straight, uncooked information.

Additionally, Anecdotes are not data; stories that people tell you are statistically insignificant, and generally unreflective of the whole.

RecordSage, you are hopelessly biased, and considering your attitude, unlikely to ever overcome your bias, so you should just accept it. C...
11-12-2008 9:24 PM
darkeforce
RecordSage said:

Your sources don't mean any more than my sources. What I've stated (about them being terrorists) is true, regardless of what your sources say. It's doesn't take a rocket scientist to see what's what.
It is incredibly ignorant and racist to call the Palestinians terrorist, and I'll thank you to stop it. Elsewise, we shall have to add those labels alongside your "biased" label.

And apparently, while it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see what's going on, apparently, it takes someone smarter than you to do so.
11-13-2008 1:31 AM
RecordSage
Once they denounce terrorism publicly and stop - I'll quit calling them such. But as long as they send their kids to die by blowing up others kids, willingly and intentionally - you can demean me all day long - that won't change the facts.
11-13-2008 2:35 AM
darkeforce
When did they approve terrorism? I must have missed the vote where Palestinian people decided to use terrorism as a collective whole.

The Palestinian people have denounced terrorism; many of them do it every day. You just don't want to let go of your hateful little label you've stuck the Palestinian people with, because then your twisted perception of the Middle East won't jibe anymore.

How about this? I'll stop calling Israelis terrorists and bullies when they denounce military action against the indigenous people of their land; i.e. the Palestinians. Frankly, I'm surprised that Israel hasn't taken a lesson from their Big Brother, America, and given the Palestinians blankets infected with smallpox or something worse.
11-13-2008 2:22 PM
RecordSage
When? When they elected hamas! When they come out and treat suicide bombers as heroes, when they brain-wash their kids against the Jews in kindergartens, when they kill their own, when they send their kids to die by killing others as if that was some sort of heroic deed, when they go out and kill each other, just because it's a different faction.

Show me when palestinians as people have denounced terrorism? I can show you a recent article about an 18-yr old girl, who just got married and she's proudly getting ready to go and die somewhere in Israel.

I don't 'hate' the palestinians as people, but I completely disagree with their tactics to advance their agenda. You think my perception i...
11-13-2008 10:52 PM
darkeforce
So you still haven't noticed how the wonderful news media only finds the radical and lunatic segments of any foreign society to show to their people. The regular people who want to live in peace are boring, and bad for their media company's bottom line.

I don't care what you've seen on the media; the world of the media isn't real. It's a carefully filtered and manipulated world view that is intended to get their company the most views; and people who want to blow themselves up get viewers.

The people in Palestine reject terrorism every day. You just don't see it, because it isn't good script. The media in Israel and America has an ulterior motive in portraying the Palestinians as a bunch o...
11-14-2008 2:37 AM
RecordSage
The people in Palestine reject terrorism every day. You just don't see it, because it isn't good script.
Show me some evidence of such. Don't just throw words on the table - show me some examples of such.

As for the media carefully doing whatever - explain how that works. If they're showing us missiles being fired in Gaza at Israeli towns - what exactly is that supposed to represent? Are they just hunting and missing somehow? When they show people on the streets marching by the hundreds, if not more, many of which are dressed in ski masks with RPGs and other weaponry, carrying portraits of a recent suicide bomber - is that some sort of peace march? Or is that a Hollywoo...
11-14-2008 2:40 AM
RecordSage
You want to counter it with more than BS like 'propaganda' & 'foolish' - you certainly can, otherwise - guess is actually foolish.

And don't tell me what I bothered or not bothered to look into, you have no clue there.
11-14-2008 3:49 AM
darkeforce
Go to Palestine, and you'll see it everywhere, if you don't believe me.

And again, you're pigeonholing an entire nation of people based on the actions of a few in the lunatic fringe. Until you stop doing that, I'm not going to give you anything. Or maybe I'll decide to judge all Americans based on the actions of the members of the Westboro Baptist Church?

Or are you going to throw in your ignorance of Palestinian culture as your defence for blatant prejudice. When you've got something other than cries of "Foolish", "Propaganda" and "Show me" (typical Republican attempts to sidetrack from the issue at hand), come talk to me. Until then, you're just another racist freak. You've been given th...
11-14-2008 3:50 AM
darkeforce
You've told me what you've looked into with your blatant ignorance about the situation. I don't need to say anything else; you've classified yourself as ignorant and racist.
11-14-2008 1:25 PM
RecordSage
You may have classified me as such, but that's certainly not the case. Victims of racism don't make very good racists. And if the best examples of your side you have is to call me names - well, that speaks volumes for your 'credibility'.
11-14-2008 8:25 PM
darkeforce
Au contraire. Victims of racism are often the biggest racists you'll ever find. American Black people have a tremendous amount of racism within their collective group; just so, the Jews. When's the last time you called someone an Antisemite? Did you realize that Palestinians are Semites, too? Guess what? You're an antisemite.

I don't call you names; I simply use the labels that you've earned for yourself with your racist comments.
11-15-2008 12:52 AM
JoelC
I don't call you names; I simply use the labels that you've earned for yourself with your racist comments.
But you most certainly DID hijack this thread which was supposed to be about the possiblilty of IRAN having nuclear weapons or a recent test of one. If you want to talk crap about zionists or anti-semites then take it eleswhere. I was actually looking forward to some new information on this from others until you and your tripe showed up with your soap box.
11-15-2008 1:45 AM
darkeforce
What nukes?

The IAEA has determined that the US and Israel used faked intelligence to determine that. Face it; there are no nukes in Iran.

You're one to talk about soap-boxes, with you full load of right-wing nutjob propaganda; and none of it substantiated. You want to worry about nukes? Worry about America's. America has done nothing in the past 8 years to reduce its nuclear stockpile. That's something to be worried about.
11-16-2008 12:37 AM
ratcatcher2
Sharon's Terror Child: How the Likud Bloc Mid-wifed the Birth of Hamas
[i]
Hamas is considered one of Israel's greatest threats, but the Islamic terrorist organization found its beginnings in the misguided Israeli effort to encourage the rise of a religious alternative that would undermine the popularity of the Palestine Liberation Organization and Yasir Arafat.

The strategy resulted in the birth of Hamas which rose from these Islamic roots. Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon was a member of the government when the policy was developed in the late 1970s.

Although Sharon and his Likud (formerly Herut Party[b]...
11-16-2008 1:23 AM
ratcatcher2
@ JoelC
from Darkforce I don't call you names; I simply use the labels that you've earned for yourself with your racist comments.
But you most certainly DID hijack this thread which was supposed to be about the possiblilty of IRAN having nuclear weapons or a recent test of one. If you want to talk crap about zionists or anti-semites then take it eleswhere. I was actually looking forward to some new information on this from others until you and your tripe showed up with your soap box.
It was I that first mentioned in a one liner
Israel doesn't know if it has nukes or not, officially.
Who do you think that you are apart from Real ...
11-16-2008 3:08 AM
RecordSage
@ratcatcher2

JoelC has as much right to say what he wants as you do. And as for your
Who do you think that you are apart from Real Name: n/a Location: unknown
that's very comical considering that's your entry as well.
11-16-2008 4:31 AM
darkeforce
And ratcatcher has the right to call a hypocrite out when he sees one.
11-16-2008 8:17 AM
ratcatcher2
@RecordSage
JoelC has as much right to say what he wants as you do. And as for your
Mine was ...
Who do you think that you are apart from Real Name: n/a Location: unknown Joined: 10-23-2008 ? What contribution have you made that gives you the notion that you can dictate to us how we should conduct. You have NO clips, 7 'Pops' and 8 comments. Have you been banned previously and are now back to make more trouble? Certainly your attempts to deliberately taunt clippers is noteworthy, don't you think?
Nowhere did I question his right to give his opinion. I queried his opinion as I am more than entitled to do so.

I have loads of clips, pops a...
11-17-2008 9:37 PM
ratcatcher2
The ratcatcher want to know where JoelC is gone? He hunts him here, he hunts him there, he hunts him everywhere.

Has the vermin-killer triumphed?
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
Embed This Clip In Your Site...

New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK