Johanna_G says: Die israelische Regisseurin Natalie Assouline hat über zwei Jahre Palästinenserinnen begleitet, die nach gescheiterten Selbstmordanschlägen in Israel inhaftiert wurden. Entstanden ist ein aufwühlender Film voller Widersprüche. Honey? I have a hard time translating your German. Sorry. Debbie, in "Johanna_G says", the clipped text passages are rendered in their the original German version on qantara.de. I am glad that the articles on qantara.de appear in a German, in an English, and in a Turkish version. NB: As long as you have a hard time translating my Deutsch only - and not my gauche English - I can put my mind at rest. Hugs, J. :-x and these prisoners do see themselves as martyrs. That is part of their self-deception.Odd jump in your logic. Check out Bobby Sands and friends. Martyr? All self-deception? Don't think so. Sorry Israeli logic. That jump in logic is the kernel of the problem. Whose eyes, whose judgement? Israeli logicSorry, I don't know what that is. Igal Avidan is an Israeli, yes. Ehud Olmert is an Israeli, too. Ariel Sharon was an Israeli. And Uri Avnery is an Israeli, as well. Now tell me something on "Israeli logic". But you may be right, righthand, asking "Whose eyes, whose judgement?" Your question relates to the suicide attackers' self-attribution as martyrs. martyr If a martyr take his/her own life by starvation like Bobby Sands and his fellow Irish, and no other while this female attempted to become a martyr by explosion and the hope to take other with her, are either martyrs? States spend fortunes to learn to kill their enemies remotely like the drones. Collateral casualties are taken as acceptable. Is there a double standard here? Ok for states to assassinate but not the most downtrodden in the world? Ok for states to assassinate?NO. Ok for the most downtrodden in the world to assassinate?NO. Even tyrannicide is ethically not that simple. OK for anybody to spread terror? NO! NO!! NO!!! OK for anybody to tread down anybody? NO. NO!! NO!!! Can the idea of becoming a martyr be based on deception or, respectively, self-deception? YES. Would I call suicide attackers who have torn a random gathering of people to shreds, martyrs? NO. Or, to be precise, I don't give a shit about their martyrdom or non-martyrdom. They are criminals and/or psychopaths, and that's that! Would I call suicide attackers who have torn a random gathering of people to shreds, martyrs? NO. Or, to be precise, I don't give a shit about their martyrdom or non-martyrdom. They are criminals and/or psychopaths, and that's that!and in an ideal just world you're correct. It something like the Catholic Church amd condoms. Wrong but everyone does. Think of kids throwing stones at armoured tanks and getting killed. Now drones in the sky targeting whoever. Do you want the other side to fight with two hands tied behind their backs? Think the USA Kosovo. So new states can be created. Or is it only when the USA says so. So if countries seek back the bits of their territory all... |
View the Top Clips from March 10, 2008
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
|
|
|