Interesting point of view...but I'm not sure whether I agree with that.

It makes sense to me given the reading list. The thing I hated about traditional research pre-google/wikipedia was having to go through archaic systems to find information.

I see wikipedia as a starting point, especially since most articles reference their sources at the bottom.

Very interesting. I don't agree with her point of view though. Information is easier obtained through the internet; I don't see the point of complicating my access to information.

My college also bans citing these sources.

@yanceducat
Wouldn't that also apply to research books? They’ll pick any book relatively close to what they are researching and cite it even if the information provided didn't suffice? A lazy researcher is lazy with any material. That's what I think anyway

Google Scholar. Check it out under the more drop down.

Academic peer-reviewed articles.