Clipmarks
Alexianfollowshare
11-17-2008 2:59 PM
353 views
Alexian says:
Why left wing governance should be utterly rejected...pt.11
24 Comments   | Add a Comment
11-18-2008 4:47 AM
darkeforce
The separation of Church and State must be absolute. Reject Right-wing governance as the outdated fossil it is.
11-18-2008 12:38 PM
Spiritualmonkey
Why do fundamentalist Christians hate freedom?
11-18-2008 4:55 PM
wicketbound
Whatever you may mean by"fundamentalist Christians" I can only speculate on because you didn't reveal your definition of that group.However,I can confidently state that true Christians cannot hate freedom.Why would they,since they are the only ones that are truly free? Those that oppose Christ are the haters(of truth,of God,goodness,righteousness,law,etc.) since they are not on Christ's side.This is Christ's witness.Your conception of freedom is not a biblical one and therefore I deem your analysis to be non credible compared to Christ's
11-18-2008 8:36 PM
darkeforce
@Spiritualmonkey

Because fundamentalist Religious people (I won't call them Christians, because they fail the essential test to be a Christian; they aren't following Christ's philosophy) hate freedom because they have chosen to oppress themselves. Being oppressed, they are miserable, and feel that they must make sure that everyone else is equally oppressed; whether they choose self-oppression or not. They think that will make them feel better.
11-19-2008 1:12 AM
Spiritualmonkey
Whatever you may mean by"fundamentalist Christians" I can only speculate on because you didn't reveal your definition of that group.However,I can confidently state that true Christians cannot hate freedom.Why would they,since they are the only ones that are truly free? Those that oppose Christ are the haters(of truth,of God,goodness,righteousness,law,etc.) since they are not on Christ's side.This is Christ's witness.Your conception of freedom is not a biblical one and therefore I deem your analysis to be non credible compared to Christ's
Quite a convenient thing, to be able to say "My position is unassailable because God says so".

[url="http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F4216092...
11-19-2008 4:14 AM
wicketbound
It is not a "convenient" thing to be able to say that true Christians are the only ones that are truly free and therefore cannot hate freedom,it is a true statement based on the credibility of Christ.www.biblegateway.com/bible?version=kjv&passage=romans+8 - 33k - Cached - Similar pages
11-19-2008 4:45 AM
Alexian
I'm glad that you listened to the debate and were edified by it wicketbound.Both you and all who listen are welcome
11-19-2008 5:25 AM
darkeforce
The upthrust of that is that the world of the flesh is not for Christians. That means, the world of temporal power and politics is not something any Christian should dabble in, because his kingdom is yet to come.

In summation, anyone in political office who claims to be a Christian is a hypocrite, period.

Therefore, the Religious Right is a blasphemous movement.
11-19-2008 7:01 AM
wicketbound
The upthrust of that is that the world of the flesh is not for Christians. That means, the world of temporal power and politics is not something any Christian should dabble in, because his kingdom is yet to come.-darkeforce
"Jesus said unto them, Is it not for this cause that ye err, that ye know not the scriptures, nor the power of God?...ye therefore do greatly err." Mark 12:24,27 "yea and before governors and kings(the world of the flesh) shall ye be brought for my sake, for a testimony to them and to the Gentiles(the world of the flesh)." Matthew 10:18 1 Corinthians 3:21"Therefore let no man glory in men. ...
11-19-2008 6:49 PM
darkeforce
Note that Corinthians is irrelevant to a Christian. It is the testament of Paul, not Christ.

You will not that Mark says you will "give testimony"; not control or influence them. You say your piece, and then let them do as they will. Meddling in the politics of the world is hypocritical for Christians.
11-19-2008 8:20 PM
wicketbound
It is horribly wrong,deceitful,blasphemous,and ignorant for you to reject any part of the word of God as being irrelevant darkeforce.Corinthians is part of the witness of the Paraclete declaring the record and message of the Christ to all men so that they may be saved. Paul is recognized by the other apostles as being an apostle and by Christ himself as being such by virtue of seeing the resurrected Christ himself and performance of such acts as accompany apostolic presence.He therefore speaks with the same authority as the twelve "as one born out of due time". Peter himself bears witness of Paul's apostoli...
11-19-2008 10:00 PM
willhelm
NIce clip, alexian. The revelation of Christ was liberty and freedom. When we confound the morons, they make bigger morons of themselves. It can't be helped. The confusion is based in irrationality, the irrationality that asserts Christians hate freedom makes one wonder if the thinking of such a mind is remotely healthy, considering the opening of the 'new world' and foundation of the U.S. has it's basis in Calvinist theology and individual liberty.

We can be sure that these people (leftists) believe there are new things unfolding in the world. The only new history is the history they are ignorant of. The basis of our Constitution is based in the concept of our endowed rights. Our rights D...
11-20-2008 1:41 AM
darkeforce
It's very ignorant for you to consider the entire bible to be God's word, wicketbound. Only the 5 epistles are important to Chistians; the rest is just thoughtful reading, but no law unto true Christians. That is why there is the Holy Spirit. That leads you to the parts of the bible that are truly God's word. Do you truly think that the machinations of opportunistic men for 2000 years would truly produce an unpolluted version of God's word? That's insane. God expects us to use our brains; that's why he gave them to us. If we were just supposed to follow the bible blindly, then he'd have only given us a spinal cord.

Where does Jesus ever say that the bible is God's word; especially the parts...
11-20-2008 1:54 AM
darkeforce
You're mistaken, willhelm (colour me surprised); Religion hates freedom. Fortunately, Christianity isn't a religion. Religion is what Satan took, and twisted the worship of God into, making it obsess about worldly, meaningless things.

So, yes. Religious fundamentalists do hate freedom, because they don't follow the philosophy of Christ, but rather the philosophy of the world.
11-20-2008 3:40 PM
Alexian
I've thought it over and decided to leave the wicked and willfully ignorant darkesnores comments up to now remain.Sometimes it is profitable to let the classically ignorant and debased like darkey foam out their own shame and in so doing instruct others as to the bankruptcy of their "mental methane" emissions.And so with or without further ado,we will wait in wonder for the electronic "smell" of the darkewhore legend to erupt with its patented last word reflex "brain poot" mechanism...
11-20-2008 4:22 PM
tommy2balmy
I've thought it over and decided to leave the wicked and willfully ignorant darkesnores comments up to now remain.
Wow, How incredibly courageous and magnanimous of you to allow another opinion then your own to remain.
11-20-2008 4:47 PM
Alexian
Thanks for the feigned limbicly vacant praise tommy but we all await the famed reflexive and "patented" darkeshores "brain poot"
11-20-2008 7:09 PM
darkeforce
I'm touched. You have more balls that most of the right-wing nutjobs here. They're afraid to hear challenges to their almighty opinions — as fraudulent and ignorant as they are.

You're little puffs and wheezes of conservative constipation brighten my day, because it shows me that no matter how stupid and clueless the people I meet every day are, I know that there is a handful of people more clueless, more ignorant, more self-destructive, more self-deluded and more full of themselves than even the worst buttmunch I see each day.

Thanks for lowering the bar every day, Alexian. You've made your subclass proud.
11-20-2008 8:02 PM
Alexian
Feel better now after your little doggy pooter electronic release darkenoise?Now just maybe you'll take your plugs out and genuinely listen to the entire debate and/or start really reading God's word and letting it speak to you and interpret itself instead of you wresting it and reaching your own ill conceived delusions( which would be the superior choice).Wicketbound's witness to you is true along with willhelm's.Hear these men(or women) as they try to help you and stop being so self loathing.Why should you fall by God's mighty sword(as all who remain in your mindset surely will) when there is still time for a substitution for your sentence? "We are ambassadors therefore on behalf of Chris...
11-21-2008 3:34 AM
darkeforce
Do you feel better? You're the one with a persecution complex.

God's word speaks to me through the Holy Spirit, not through Man. God's word is personal to each of us. However, if you would actually try reading the bible with the Holy Spirit in your heart, you will see that it refutes a good number of those assumptions.

The first thing that you should learn from it is that it's from actions that we are judged, not words. Speaking a "good game" means nothing if you don't live it. Once you've learned that, then maybe you'll be able to criticize me without looking like a complete hypocrite.
11-21-2008 11:10 PM
willhelm
Religion hates freedom.
On the level of semantics, dorkfarce, I would not really disagree with that. I've always believed that religion can be the quickest way to condemnation. However, on a theological level, I am not mistaken.
11-22-2008 12:33 AM
darkeforce
Oooh, he's calling me names now. How mature and "loving".

Theology's the problem. Once you make a life philosophy like Christianity into Religion, you steal all the benefit out of it, reducing it to a mere humanities topic; dragging out the opinions of 2000 years world of humans what they think God's word means. That is all that the bible is; the opinions of mortal people, with some secondhand information on the life of Christ. The teachings of Christ are in there, as well as the prophesies that proved Jesus was who he was, but most of the rest of the bible is just opinions; opinions of people who claimed to have spoken with God.

Do we all remember the last person who was famous fo...
11-22-2008 2:35 AM
willhelm
It was a typo.
11-29-2008 12:48 AM
bilgewhuump
Oooh, he's calling me names now. How mature and "loving".
Yer jutht tho HARD (mmm) to read, dankspores.

How doeth a perthon know when you've thuddenly modulated into a loving thtate of mind.

How'th a thweet boy to ever know.
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
Embed This Clip In Your Site...

New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK