No, actually not a superior race. We're human. They're human. Same race.
As for regimes that should be allowed by the world community to produce and possess nuclear material and weaponry, only a mind with anti-American motivations equal to that of those particular regimes would actually support their unfettered unmonitored allowance.
What is problematic with the popular attitude of nukes-for radical-gov'ts. is the seeming motivation behind the "opinion".
The subject(s) appears to see no value in the U.S. maintaining weapon superiority over unstable states or radical leaders, esp. those who have made known their murderous desires and tendencies. As the psychopath senses no empa...

No, actually not a superior race. We're human. They're human. Same race.
As for regimes that should be allowed by the world community to produce and possess nuclear material and weaponry, only a mind with anti-American motivations equal to that of those particular regimes would actually support their unfettered unmonitored allowance.
What is problematic with the popular attitude of nukes-for radical-gov'ts. is the seeming motivation behind the "opinion".
The subject(s) appears to see no value in the U.S. maintaining weapon superiority over unstable states or radical leaders, esp. those who have made known their murderous desires and tendencies. As the psychopath senses no empathy or "texture" of the human emotion, esp.outside of his own self, this misaligned subject senses no "texture", perceives no difference in nation-states with radical regimes or violent prejudiced intentions and terrorist harboring gov'ts. Use of irony such as

So what?

WHERE DID ISRAEL GET ITS URANIUM?

From the US or one of its allies, but that is okay because we "know better" and are a superior race.

reveals a complete and utter unawareness of the type of situation which the healthy brain is able to interpret more realistically.

...regime....

The more common use in mass media, a regime in the sense of a political system is the set of rules, both formal (for example, a constitution) and informal (common law,
cultural or social norms, etc.) that regulate the operation of
government and its interactions with the economy and society. For
instance, the United States has one of the oldest regimes still active in the world, dating to the ratification of its Constitution in 1789.

The term need not imply anything about the particular government

to which it relates, and most political scientists use it as a neutral term.

Political scientist Fred Ju...

read more»

...regime....

The more common use in mass media, a regime in the sense of a political system is the set of rules, both formal (for example, a constitution) and informal (common law,
cultural or social norms, etc.) that regulate the operation of
government and its interactions with the economy and society. For
instance, the United States has one of the oldest regimes still active in the world, dating to the ratification of its Constitution in 1789.

The term need not imply anything about the particular government

to which it relates, and most political scientists use it as a neutral term.

Political scientist Fred Judson defines a regime as the "relationship between the state, society, (the) market, and global insertion".