blueridge says: They both shilled for neocon propaganda, contrary to the most recent National Intel Estimate which says that Iran has been deterred on nukes, and Hillary proposed a middle east "umbrella" (read NATO-like alliance) for military intervention, very similar to McCain's. There is no real choice, in foreign policy, or big spending, in the 3 candidates. WARS will continue, and here is the evidence. Both shill for Israel blatantly. (Hillary: 'Oh Israeli Lobby--please let me be President, listen to my hawkish war speak on defense of Israel and against Iran, despite the lack of evidence!') and the ABC debate ignored it, and so did the headlines after the "debate": OLBERMANN: After 24 hours of letting this sink in, how in the world is this not the headline out of that debate last night? |
View the Top Clips from April 19, 2008
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|