Clipmarks
merriefollowshare
10-22-2007 6:12 AM
701 views
merrie says:
The official described the pictures as showing a big cylindrical structure, with very thick walls all well-reinforced. The photos show rebar hanging out of the cement used to reinforce the structure, which was still under construction.
There was also a secondary structure and a pump station, with trucks around it. But there was no fissionable material found because the facility was not yet operating.
The official said there was a larger structure just north of a small pump station; a nuclear reactor would need a constant source of water to keep it cool.
14 Comments   | Add a Comment
10-22-2007 7:26 PM
The REAL Napster
POPPED... Just like the Syrians little reactor site 'that didn't exist'. BTW- Israel just thumbed their noses at your crappy Russian defense systems. Next time try dollars instead of Rubles. Now all they have is Rubble.
10-22-2007 8:53 PM
merrie
Hi REAL,
Rubles to rubble, great line Also, the only one
who seemingly wasn't aware of the news-black-out,
was Kim Jong il

If they could stop doing their Mecca thing 5x's a day, they would be able to develop their own technical
knowledge and skills. They may prefer outsourcing
technical contractors b/c they might expose
themselves to blackmail and extortion if the
technicians were their own nationals. Culture of
paranoia. The question becomes, who is going to
pull the trigger and when? The clock is running out.
10-23-2007 4:32 AM
davboz
Except N.Korea's reactors are gas-cooled or so this guy says:
http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/1683/more-syria-nonsenseSeems to have some contacts.
The problem here is that North Korea’s reactors are gas-cooled. You see, if there is a pump , the reactor can not be, as David Sanger and Mark Mazzetti reported, “modeled on one North Korea has used to create its stockpile of nuclear weapons.”
So, one of the two stories is dead wrong. It either is either
water-cooled or it resembles the reactor at Yongbyon, which is
gas-cooled.
I wonder if "a senior U.S.official" saying something only means we can then know that that is what it is NOT.
And NObody's getti...
10-23-2007 4:33 AM
davboz
Line 4: "Seems to....."
10-23-2007 4:58 AM
merrie
They probably have more intel than just the photo's,
but that's a moot point now. The only positive result
they got out of the exercise, was that they were able
to manipulate the Russian defence system.
Great link. I bookmark that kind of stuff.
10-24-2007 12:54 AM
The REAL Napster
The only 'known' reactor in Syria uses a water pool to cool the reactor core, not gas.

[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miniature_neutron_source_reactor][b]Miniature neutron source reactor
[/url][/b](From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)


The Chinese built Miniature Neutron Source reactor (MNSR) is a small and compact research reactor based on the Canadian SLOWPOKE reactor design.

The MNSR is tank-in-pool type, with highly enriched fuel (~ 90% U235 ). The tank is immersed in a large pool, and the core is, in turn, immersed in the tank. The maximum nominal power is ~ 30 kW, the power being removed by natural convection. The central core is formed of about 347 fu...
10-24-2007 12:55 AM
The REAL Napster
Grrr... seems Skidmarks is acting up again.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miniature_neutron_source_reactor
10-24-2007 2:05 AM
merrie
I'm no international nuclear proliferation expert, but
clearly, that sounds like a brazen violation!

It seems to be a matter of which gets us first,
Global Warming or Nuclear Winter.
10-24-2007 11:10 AM
The REAL Napster
Syria has denied having a nuclear program. But beginning construction of a nuclear reactor in secret would violate Syria's obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, which requires all signatories to declare their intent when such a decision is made, according to sources at the International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N. nuclear watchdog.
12-12-2009 1:35 AM
RobPrell
Spin lies, spin and more lies. That is what the news sounds like on this issue. Lets look at the facts. 1) Syria already has other reactors that are under inspection and disclosed, MNSR type built by China. The "bombed" site was a gas reactor design, different type. 2) Syria signed the nuclear non proliferation treaty, Israel has not. What they did does not violate that treaty. You don't have to disclose a site your building, you only have to disclose when it is operation. 3) Israel conducted yet the latest unprovoked attack of its neighbors industrial capabilities. There was zero threat to them. They just like to keep everyone down who is near the through military actions. Where ...
12-12-2009 1:38 AM
RobPrell
Research the attack on the USS Liberty. Attacked by Israel and made to look like Egypt attacked it.
12-12-2009 1:39 AM
RobPrell
Israel bough its first Nuke Reactors from France. How is what Syria any different? Why is it ok for Israel but wrong and vile for Syria? The only difference is our hate propaganda.
12-12-2009 1:46 AM
merrie
Hey Rob, your traveling circus is leaving town, get your clown shoes and wig and "Beat It"
12-12-2009 3:29 AM
merrie
But many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come."

We are told again and again by "experts" and "talking heads" that Islam is the religion of peace, and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace.

Although this unquantified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the specter of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of...
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
Embed This Clip In Your Site...

New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK