Hate that manifests itself in violent action, particularly against groups of people should always be opposed.

1. This is hypocrisy and pretense. There is no such thing as a love crime. Laws are on the books that prosecute all violent crimes, against anyone, already now. This pretense goes much further and is dangerous...and is a mere stepping stone in a larger process that authorizes social revolution to trample and persecute historic public mores and moral judgments, and everyone knows it. Is the purpose then to prosecute "hate"? No.

The "hate" of some others is manifest, but not converted into a crime, a gross hypocrisy that sees the "speck" in another's eye ...

Hate that manifests itself in violent action, particularly against groups of people should always be opposed.

1. This is hypocrisy and pretense. There is no such thing as a love crime. Laws are on the books that prosecute all violent crimes, against anyone, already now. This pretense goes much further and is dangerous...and is a mere stepping stone in a larger process that authorizes social revolution to trample and persecute historic public mores and moral judgments, and everyone knows it. Is the purpose then to prosecute "hate"? No.

The "hate" of some others is manifest, but not converted into a crime, a gross hypocrisy that sees the "speck" in another's eye and accuses while blind toward self and the "beam" in their own eye. There are no laws against hating Christians, for example, even if it led to a beating. Why? To the contrary, this is fair game, and applauded by the "tolerance" hypocrites (including on Clipmarks).

2. There should be no special protected classes of citizens, nor laws that fashion such. This one clearly does and is therefore unequal. Yet "equal rights" is all we hear, while inequality like this is the result.

3. It is a threat to freedom of speech, religion, and liberty of conscience, for the "hate" aspect is very subjective and tampers with intellectual beliefs, just like those of Inquisitions historically. This is how "hate" is determined, but by whose standards?
The so-called "hate crime" therefore is really a "thought crime", where a public Orthodoxy is erected, and any belief contrary therefore a Heresy. This will come next, naked by itself, without any violence necessary to charge. This will lead to persecutory new profiling for "suspects", for intellectual, moral, or religious beliefs.

For solid analysis on "hate crimes" versus the Constitution see video here.