Clipmarks
jklugmanfollowshare
9-27-2008 11:45 AM
1843 views
jklugman says:
There have been many clips here arguing that the Community Reinvestment Act (legislation forcing banks to loan in areas from which they take deposits, enacted in 1977 and strengthened in 1995) caused the subprime meltdown, because banks were forced to make loans in poor areas.

Robert Gordon shows that the CRA could not have been responsible for the subprime meltdown for two reasons:

1. Timing--CRA activity largely slowed down by 2002, yet sub-prime lending continued to intensify.
2. Lenders NOT covered by CRA played a huge role in sub-prime lending. "Half of sub-prime loans came from...mortgage companies beyon the reach of CRA...Most important, the lenders subject to CRA have engaged in less, not more, of the most dangerous lending...Independent mortgage companies...not covered by CRA, made high-price loans at more than twice the rate of the banks and thrifts."
5 Comments   | Add a Comment
9-27-2008 1:24 PM
ratilfar
Blame the victim is alive and well.
9-27-2008 2:31 PM
Satchamo
Maybe CRA's didn't contribute after 2001, but how can a business justify lending money at a low interest rate (ARM) mortgage, knowing that these borrowers are highly likely to default (especially when the interest rate jumps), and then scream foul when lots of them default and drag them into bankruptcy. Of course, not all blame should fall on the lenders, what were the borrowers thinking about, an ARM by definition means the rate changes, what did they think they were going to do when the rate went up instead of down? I see enough blame on both sides, lender & borrower, that I really don't care in we bail out the lenders. I know, I know, the economy will crash, but that's part of why we n...
9-28-2008 2:37 AM
dulios
As a former ACORN organizer, I now admit it was all my fault. I beg forgiveness.
9-28-2008 5:02 PM
jklugman
Conservative academic Stephen Bainbridge looked at the data and found that while blacks are overrepresented among sub-prime borrowers (16.2 %, as opposed to 12% among the general population), the overwhelming majority of sub-prime borrowers are non-minorities (72.5%).

The sub-prime crisis cannot be laid at the feet of the CRA.

Bainbridge on conservatives who blame CRA for the sub-prime crisis: "they’re embarrassing the rest of us who share that label."
10-5-2008 4:09 AM
jklugman
I loved this comment by Rick Perlstein:

Rick Perlstein said:

the right-wing smear du jour: the Community Reinvestment Act caused the meltdown, not greedy bankers and the oily politicians who love them. As regular readers at OurFuture.org know, we've called the idea a modern day equivalent of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion—a Big Lie narrative that blames a despised, outcast social group for problems they had nothing to do with, in order to aggrandize the ability of the dominant group to hate and oppress.[1]
In another blog entry, Rick Perlstein also notes the hypocrisy of it all, si...
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
Embed This Clip In Your Site...

New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK