What is so aggravating about the constant noise about the "Liberal Press", is that this administration has gotten its way with the press and it certainly has not been a "liberal" love affair. The press and media should have been doing its job instead of pandering to this administration. If it has done its job (ie Watergate), then we might not right now be trying to figure out how the hell to get out of Iraq, and stop the maiming and killing of our sons and daughters ,not to mention all the Iraqi civilians...and their sons and daughters. This mess has been a "pipe dream" of a few old neo-conservative men who basically wanted to relive Vietnam, and force a different outcome. Google Neoconservative, Google PNAC (Project For The New American Century} , and then think about whether or not this war was a war of choice and the same old story about old men, and war.

About 8 years ago, when my home-schooled son started reading more mature literature he was reading about "media bias ('by-us')" when it came to some political issues.

He asked me, "what's media 'bee-ass'?"

I almost fell out of my chair, laughing. I corrected him with the proper pronunciation but told him that indeed, the media can be an "ass", but that's basically what "media bias" is.

The more I read about the Libby trial and the media manipulation by Bush-Rove Co, I see exactly how "assed" the media is.

Sadly, if there were more "liberal bias" in the media over the last few years, we wouldn't be trying to figure out how to get our asses out of Iraq right now.

What's Colbert say? Reality has a well-known "liberal bias"?