Clipmarks
enbarfollowshare
9-24-2008 1:21 AM
1354 views
enbar says:
Interview with Bobby Kennedy, Jr., on various allegations of vote-suppression schemes. My first instinct on reading this is to think, "conspiracy nut." But it's not actually as far-fetched as one would like to think.
21 Comments   | Add a Comment
9-24-2008 12:56 PM
The REAL Napster
You know what? The DUTY to keep your voting record up to date lies SOLEY with the individual. YOU are supposed to contact your county clerk when you move, change your name,etc...

All these people who moan and complain have nobody to blame but THEMSELVES. Maybe if YOU did your job, someone else wouldn't have to do it for you. Pathetic, lazy slackers.
9-24-2008 1:30 PM
enbar
Everything you say is technically true, I suppose. I don't know if you read the clip, though -- that's not what this is about.
9-24-2008 3:37 PM
Satchamo
Yes, technically the clip & Napster's comment are a little different, but again, we are responsible for how we register our vehicles, deed our property, names we put on application forms for the government, etc. So, as Napster states (infers), when you don't use the same name, address, etc., then to computers who are checking these records, you are different people (anyone with a computer knows that when they search a term, if they spell it wrong, some searches will come back with no results). There are too many records to physically check them by humans and try to match them. And we saw how good humans are in the Florida voting debacle, what is a chad, a hanging chad, not a hanging chad?etc., etc.
9-24-2008 4:43 PM
enbar
Look. Here's a hypothetical situation, which, if the clip is correct, could very well become reality. I have been voting at the same polling place for six years. There are no probelms with my registration. I've used the same form of ID (my state-issued driver license) when asked to present it (let's leave aside the question of whether that's legal). My name is, let's say, John Quincy Doe. I have no idea whether my Social Security records, birth certificate, motor vehicle records, and voter registration records show me as "John Doe," "John Q Doe," or "John Quincy Doe." In fact let's sayI registered with a handwritten form in 1998 and maybe the clerk transcribing it typed in "Jon Q. Doe...
9-24-2008 4:56 PM
The REAL Napster
So they'll look at your social security records, your motor vehicle records and any time you've had any interaction with the government and if there is any information on your voter registration that is different than the information on another government record that they find they remove you from the voting rolls.
I call B.S. on this 'claim' unless they have solid proof, of which I highly doubt. You see, state workers (like most) want to keep their jobs like everyone else and sure wouldn't jepordize their income to purge records illegally. For anyone.

Let's look at some 'Bills' as put forth from Congress shall we?

S. 17
Voting Opportunity and Te...
9-24-2008 4:58 PM
The REAL Napster
*For a complete description of Colorado voting regulations see Colorado[/b] Election Rules as ammended May 30, 2007. Colorado even has rules for 'homeless' people voting.


www.cm-life.com/media/storage/paper906/news/2008/09/24/News/Aclu-Files.Voter.Registration.Complaint.Against.Michigan-3448501.shtml" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">On the 'issue' of students losing voting rights because they make residence in a different state, did you know the LAW requires you to surrender your out of state license when you get apply for one in your new state?
9-24-2008 5:05 PM
enbar
Oh so now we get to the part of the conversation where we cut and paste stuff from other websites? Sorry, Napster, but your links don't work and I don't understand how little snippets from Congressional bills from 2005 are supposed to prove that people aren't being purged from the rolls for the reasons described above. But i hope you're right.
9-24-2008 5:13 PM
dulios
I registered to vote by mail when I left one state for another in 2004. When I showed up to vote (in Indianapolis, Indiana), I was shown to the line for provisional voting. I showed them my voter registration card and my picture ID, but it wasn't enough. I had to go back to my car and get my insurance papers and registration - that's right, not one, but 3 forms of ID. And I still had to cast a provisional ballot. I'm not sure to this day that my vote was ever counted.
9-24-2008 5:27 PM
The REAL Napster
are supposed to prove that people aren't being purged from the rolls for the reasons described above. But i hope you're right.
Sorry about the links, They looked ok in the text editor window.Another bug?

Anyways, my main concern with the 'claim' is that either exagerated or distorted flat out. Did you know that since 9/11 the states have all had to crack down on verifying ID's and making it harder to get driver licenses? In Georgia for instance, women who recently married and went to vote were dropped off lists becuase their surname didn't match up with thier SSN.

And like the Congressional bills pointed out, they simply cannot notify you by mail with a po...
9-24-2008 6:00 PM
enbar
You are quoting federal regulations, but a number of state Secretaries of State claim that state election codes supersede federal codes. And a lot of the issues here are procedural, not statutory, as I understand it. The fact is that there is no legal basis for tying voter registration to documents issued by a state's motor vehicle registry, although this has been done in a number of places now. You must realize that resident aliens also qualify for driver licenses, but they don't get to register as voters either. So I don't see the relevance of your comments about driver licenses for students and for illegal immigrants. No one claims that you need a driver license to vote or that a driver l...
9-24-2008 6:14 PM
The REAL Napster
No one claims that you need a driver license to vote or that a driver license proves your eligibility to vote. What you need is not a driver license but a voter registration.
Actually many states do. Mine is just one of them. I encourage you to check your own states voting requirements. And if I don't even have a drivers license I can show a current utility bill.

As is plainly evident in my states voting laws as ammeded May 30th 2007,

30.2 Voter registration in person.

30.2.1 Registering in Person. The elector must provide:
● A valid Colorado Driver’s License number;
● if the voter does not have a valid colorado driver’s license, the voter shall p...
9-24-2008 6:24 PM
enbar
Now I'm really confused. You say that Colorado requires you to have a driver's license to vote, and then you quote code that says that you don't need one. What are you trying to argue here?
9-24-2008 9:24 PM
willhelm
Excellent comments, Napster. I think what is missed is the underlying motive for the objection to well kept voting rolls and personal responsibility. It decreases fraud. The old standard thinking that Conservatives need to win by 2% in actual vote to overcome the fraud has probably grown. In places like Illinois, New Jersey, New York, and Michigan where corruption is legendary the fraud is insurmountable. The Far Left want to keep it that way.
9-24-2008 9:44 PM
enbar
willhelm, do you honestly -- honestly -- believe that the reason I'm making this argument is because I hope that the Democrats will be fraudulently elected? So far neither of you has answered the question I posed in my next-to-last comment -- do you think the hypothetical case I described is actually fair?
9-24-2008 10:28 PM
willhelm
No, enbar, I was just speaking to the ubiquitous cries from the Left about voter fraud when action is taken to keep voting registers in order to prevent fraud and attempts are made put the onus of responsibility on individuals to keep themselves up to date. We always hear resistance from the left every time efforts are made to ensure the integrity of our electoral process. Why is this? Then, you post these outlandish and quite ridiculous charges by RFK jr, no less. As if he is actually concerned about voter fraud. It is pretty funny if you ask me.
9-24-2008 11:03 PM
The REAL Napster
If you lost your home in a foreclosure, for example, you might end up having to stay with relatives for a while. You would temporarily be without a permanent fixed abode. Does this mean you lose your franchise? If states are using foreclosure lists to purge the voting rolls, it will. And you're saying that's justified and fair?
To answer your question, yes it's fair. I had a home in foreclosure while I was inventing the very technology you are using right now, on this site today. And I was also a homeless person living out of a car for months in the hot Arizona summer.

(It will all be in my upcoming book, if you care to read about it.)

The point is this clip 'cl...
9-24-2008 11:10 PM
enbar
Wait -- first you say it's fair, and then you say "life's not fair"? Which is it?
9-24-2008 11:25 PM
The REAL Napster
enbar-
It's perfectly clear. Life throws circumstances at you that don't seem fair or just, but if you want to you can rise above them. Even though I had my home in foreclosure and ended up a homeless person, I was STILL able to register to vote. As I pointed out in the comments above Colorado (and other states) makes a provision for homeless people to vote. Unless you or someone else shows us the computer code or results that kicks out voters illegally, I ain't buying his line. Show us the money. I see a blog entry and that is not proof.

2.9 Registration of Homeless Voters.
2.9.1 For the purpose of voter registration residence a homeless voter may identify a specific location wit...
9-24-2008 11:39 PM
enbar
You keep talking about this as though the issue were whether or not people were prevented from registering. That's not what the clip is about. The clip talks about situations where, in effect, a person thinks his registration is in order and has no reason to think differently (since it has been for years and nothing has changed), shows up at the polls, and finds he is not permitted to vote because he has been purged from the rolls. In that situation, your driver's license is not going to help you. Has this really happened? I'm not sure I believe this source either. I haven't found any independent confirmation. But if it has, it's a problem.
9-25-2008 12:01 AM
The REAL Napster
Funny how mybarackobama doesn't even LIST the above claim by RFK as a problem.


There are many ways that states can ensure that voters who have made a good faith effort to register, such as individuals who have registered but have been purged from the rolls or those who have moved and may not be aware that they need to re-register, are not disenfranchised. One method - Election Day Registration - has already been examined in a previous Dispatch. Today's Dispatch examines some of the reasons why those who have registered or have attempted to register may not be allowed to cast a regular ballot on elec...
9-25-2008 9:26 AM
skwirlinator
I know my vote hasn't counted since I came of age. What counts is money and the powerful's agendas. To believe otherwise is a delusion.
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
Embed This Clip In Your Site...

New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK