Profane rant comment was deleted. Anyone who cannot see the need for bestiality laws is not only irrational, but mentally disturbed. Even Sweden is moving toward a law.

Here is just one more reason why this anti-social behavior should be banned for the good of society:

Bestiality on the increase; Sex with animals 'risks worse diseases than HIV'.(News)

It endangers, at minimum, the public health, as well as abusing innocent, unwilling animals in a rape of nature by these psychopaths. Bestiality would lead to plagues worse than AIDS, and make the p...

Profane rant comment was deleted. Anyone who cannot see the need for bestiality laws is not only irrational, but mentally disturbed. Even Sweden is moving toward a law.

Here is just one more reason why this anti-social behavior should be banned for the good of society:

Bestiality on the increase; Sex with animals 'risks worse diseases than HIV'.(News)

It endangers, at minimum, the public health, as well as abusing innocent, unwilling animals in a rape of nature by these psychopaths. Bestiality would lead to plagues worse than AIDS, and make the present Swine Flu epidemic appear as nothing in comparison.

(Unreasonable censorship cannot be claimed when basic rules of civil debate and discussion are violated, which is why Clipmarks enables it and encourages monitoring. All perverse comments, merely personal attacks (not debate or argument) or filthy attacks will be deleted no matter the content of the argument. I almost let the last one stand if it were not for the filthy language.)

On many issues, we were on the same side. If an opponent is wrong, then his/her own words will hang them. Deleting comments does not allow third parties to make judgements on the comment. ClipMarks is WRONG to allow arbitrary censorship. That you commenced a clip from an article in general ow...

(Unreasonable censorship cannot be claimed when basic rules of civil debate and discussion are violated, which is why Clipmarks enables it and encourages monitoring. All perverse comments, merely personal attacks (not debate or argument) or filthy attacks will be deleted no matter the content of the argument. I almost let the last one stand if it were not for the filthy language.)

On many issues, we were on the same side. If an opponent is wrong, then his/her own words will hang them. Deleting comments does not allow third parties to make judgements on the comment. ClipMarks is WRONG to allow arbitrary censorship. That you commenced a clip from an article in general ownership gives you no more right of ownership of it than any of the rest of us. Indeed duplication of clips is quite common here.

I admire the integrity of your views. Allow others the right to be wrong. Preventing comment is not the way. Respect must be earned and not stolen.

I would have permitted his view, but have every right to cut his rude and vile remarks. There is a difference.

We'll never be able to judge if his remarks were rude or vile. One's rude and vile may not be another's. Any forum must have the same standard across the board. Individuals cannot arrive at an equal standard.

Further, every clipper can cut however they choose, and everyone does (just look around).

I, like you, clip strong topical issues. I've only every deleted on my own clips to correct one of my regular errors. Never another's comment. Most don't. Maybe my confidence to deal with opponents gives me an advantage. When I'm occasionally wrong, then I ap...

I would have permitted his view, but have every right to cut his rude and vile remarks. There is a difference.

We'll never be able to judge if his remarks were rude or vile. One's rude and vile may not be another's. Any forum must have the same standard across the board. Individuals cannot arrive at an equal standard.

Further, every clipper can cut however they choose, and everyone does (just look around).

I, like you, clip strong topical issues. I've only every deleted on my own clips to correct one of my regular errors. Never another's comment. Most don't. Maybe my confidence to deal with opponents gives me an advantage. When I'm occasionally wrong, then I apologise. Always allowing adverse comments has been to my advantage in the long run.

Anyway, in principle, I'm against censorship and particularly in these circumstances. The collective of good clippers here is the very best defence against reprobates. Retain their support by continuing to be open and honest as is usual for you.

Returning to the actual subject, here is a recent case of reported bestiality which demonstrates how such things come to light. Note that PETA, like the Humane Society above, speak of the danger of such "to the whole community", as well as the poor abused creature:

South Alabama Man Facing Bestiality Charge

The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or PETA, is bringing attention to a case of alleged bestiality in Alabama. Henry Lewis of Sweetwater is accused of having sex with a pony.

[i]According to PETA, at least two people witnessed the act about a month ago. A few days later, the pony was reported d...

Returning to the actual subject, here is a recent case of reported bestiality which demonstrates how such things come to light. Note that PETA, like the Humane Society above, speak of the danger of such "to the whole community", as well as the poor abused creature:

South Alabama Man Facing Bestiality Charge

The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or PETA, is bringing attention to a case of alleged bestiality in Alabama. Henry Lewis of Sweetwater is accused of having sex with a pony.

According to PETA, at least two people witnessed the act about a month ago. A few days later, the pony was reported dead.

"Research shows that offenders who commit bestiality often go on to commit sex crimes against humans," said PETA's Stephanie Bell. "Our belief is that the community should be following this case closely because anyone capable of this kind of cruelty poses a definitive risk to the entire community."