Agreed, she should not be P or VP. But it is just as untrustworthy to have a candidate of all the black people (I know he hasn't said it, but Oprah and other company prove it), tied to a particular radical (and racist) agenda. (Google 'Black Liberation Theology'). Why do you think Obama won North Carolina, except for a monolithic black vote?

Ron Paul has exposed Obama's war policy votes as hypocritical, while acknowledging on the surface he sounds "slightly better". At least John McCain has been honest, but the other two are hypocrites vying for office whose records show they are likely to do the same (or could easily be coerced through events into so doing by the I...

Agreed, she should not be P or VP. But it is just as untrustworthy to have a candidate of all the black people (I know he hasn't said it, but Oprah and other company prove it), tied to a particular radical (and racist) agenda. (Google 'Black Liberation Theology'). Why do you think Obama won North Carolina, except for a monolithic black vote?

Ron Paul has exposed Obama's war policy votes as hypocritical, while acknowledging on the surface he sounds "slightly better". At least John McCain has been honest, but the other two are hypocrites vying for office whose records show they are likely to do the same (or could easily be coerced through events into so doing by the Israeli Lobby and some "catalyzing events"). See Obama's hypocrisy (in part) here.

As far as Hillary, Obama, and McCain, all three will take us into more wars (mark my words) and government dominance of our everyday lives. (Heard any promises to curtail domestic spying, rescind the PATRIOT ACT or REAL ID or reverse Bush's executive orders or signing statements? The silence is deafening! What "Change"?).

May God save us from all three of them--sycophants of the Israeli Lobby! (See Obama's Israel Shuffle).