 righthand says: Bush wants to murder more. We have to kill Iranians "over there," Bush says, "before they come over here." There is no possibility that Iranians or any Muslims who have no air force, no navy, no modern military technology are going to "come over here," and no indication that they plan to do so. The Muslims are disunited and have been for centuries. That is what makes them vulnerable to colonial rule. If Muslims were united, the US would already have lost its army in Iraq. Indeed, it would not have been able to put an army in Iraq. Lacking US troops with which to invade Iran, the Bush administration has decided to bomb Iran "back into the stone age." Punishing air and missile attacks have been designed not merely to destroy Iran’s nuclear energy projects, but also to destroy the public infrastructure, the economy, and the ability of the government to function. ... http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts222.html "The Muslims are disunited and have been for centuries. " Yes, but nothing unites people like a common enemy, which the US is providing them. Very true. Oh yes, those Iranians- they are such a peaceful, loving country. NOT! Iran reportedly bombs villages in northern Iraq Strikes allegedly against suspected positions of breakaway Kurdish group Updated: 2:35 a.m. MT Sept 1, 2007 MARDOW, Iraq - As explosions boomed in the distance, a Kurdish woman stood outside her house and pointed to where shells scorched parts of her father’s grapes and plum orchards. “It was a bad day when some 20 shells hit our village in a single day last week. We were crying as we prayed to God to protect us from the bombs of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” said Serwa Ibrahim, one of the few rema... Again Napster you talk with no substance. In the report it states.( Iran REPORTEDLY bombs villages in northern Iraq ). isn't that the same thing as saying,We think they did it. We cant be sure. No real positive proof that Iran did this. And who is the author of this piece? the AP, associated press. Best way to make noise and take no responsibility, by lumping stories into a corporate entity that takes no responsibility because their a corporation. So what do we know is a fact? We as in America invaded a country on a lie. Bombed the hell out of it killing more civilians Then bad guys. Gave 200,000 weapons to who, we don't know, lost track of that one. Millions of dollars lost, meaning like... So, how much power do you think bush has in these types of things. The people that are really pulling the strings of this puppet are in the shadows. Plan B: As June 30th approaches, Israel looks to the Kurds by Seymour M. Hersh on June 28, 2004 Ehud Barak, the former Israeli Prime Minister, who supported the Bush Administration’s invasion of Iraq, took it upon himself at this point to privately warn Vice-President Dick Cheney that America had lost in Iraq; according to an American close to Barak, he said that Israel “had learned that there’s no way to win an occupation.” The only issue, Barak told Cheney, “was choosing the size of your humiliation.” Cheney did not respond to Barak’s assessment. (Chen... ...Plan B by S. Hersh... The Israeli decision to seek a bigger foothold in Kurdistan—characterized by the former Israeli intelligence officer as “Plan B”—has also raised tensions between Israel and Turkey. Israeli involvement in Kurdistan is not new. Throughout the nineteen-sixties and seventies, Israel actively supported a Kurdish rebellion against Iraq, as part of its strategic policy of seeking alliances with non-Arabs in the Middle East. In 1975, the Kurds were betrayed by the United States, when Washington went along with a decision by the Shah of Iran to stop support... Well Real I think they are following the U.S. example. According to the Iranians (and the Turks) they are merely striking terrorist targets, terrorist who have attacked their territory and armed forces. If you can do it, why can't they? Well Real I think they are following the U.S. example. According to the Iranians (and the Turks) they are merely striking terrorist targets, terrorist who have attacked their territory and armed forces. If you can do it, why can't they?You've got it in one. I was leading him to the same point by the circular route, He's not very good at accepting anything that conflicts with his own perceptions of reality. Maybe long quotes from sources are not the best but he has shown a total inadequacy in obtaining good sources himself. I feel it is a huge waste of time as he doesn't appear to comprehend anything that conflicts with his perceptions no matter what the source. And he's getti... Well Real I think they are following the U.S. example. According to the Iranians (and the Turks) they are merely striking terrorist targets, terrorist who have attacked their territory and armed forces. If you can do it, why can't they?C'mon...following the U.S. example? After ALL of these other nations villafy the U.S. for it's 'war on terror' yet they they can do it too? Talk about hypocrisy. Last time I checked 2 wrongs doesn't make a right, unless it's convienant for your purpose. That's weak and you know it. It also sounds like they never even hit the targets they claim attacked them, missing them entirely. Righthand- keep talking smack and you'll find out what h... What? Are you saying Gay Marriage isn't the most important issue for the US to be concerned about?!  |
View the Top Clips from September 1, 2007
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
|
|
|
