Clipmarks
masburyfollowshare
2-4-2009 11:30 PM
384 views
masbury says:
Wouldn't let reporter investigate
6 Comments   | Add a Comment
2-4-2009 11:39 PM
Babe_ORiley
News every passing day is increasingly tarnishing WSJ's reputation.
2-5-2009 7:50 AM
Yassin_M
Nowadays no one can say that we have "Free Speech" ... what a corruption.
2-5-2009 8:46 AM
debbyski
Not surprising.
2-5-2009 5:14 PM
ColoradoRight
isn't it shocking that newspapers decide what stories will and won't be investigated. I'm sure that nothing like this has ever happened before.

But its nice to see that its all the WSJ's fault.
2-5-2009 8:29 PM
patchworkthreads
Nowadays no one can say that we have "Free Speech" ... what a corruption.
By what definition of "free speech" do you make this claim? Last I checked, nobody at the WSJ is limiting you from speaking freely without censorship or limitation. Additionally, the reporter had the option and the right to leave the WSJ, start working for a competing media outlet, and pursue the case from there.
2-5-2009 11:20 PM
Yassin_M
reporter had the option and the right to leave the WSJ, start working
for a competing media outlet, and pursue the case from there.
This means "shut up or go away" ... Or "obey the orders, whether correct or not, or find another job" ... Then how can we improve ?? ... Don't you think that "if WSJ allow the reporter .this fraud can be eliminated"
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
Embed This Clip In Your Site...

New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK