|
Yes, "evidence" again is "being fixed around the policy" to go to war (as it was with Iraq), per the neoconservative (Project for a New American Century ) blueprint for a "new middle east" written in Sept. 2000, based upon "a catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor" (i.e. 9/11). We will see how gullible, or complicit, Congress, the media, and the American public will be in taking this lying administration at its word again. Iranian government is a bit outspoken but Iran is no threat to anyone (has never been). Once you have crossed the line, then does not matter how many times you hop over it.... I have to admit that I'm more likely to believe that Iran is working to get nukes than I was to believe that Iraq was, but I still don't think we're anywhere near the point where attacking them is the best - let alone only - option. I certainly would want a lot more evidence than just George and Dick's words on it, though. As long as its just the neocons saying that Iran is a danger, I'm not going to be totally buying it. They've cried wolf FAR too many times to put *ANY* kind of credence into their words. Bush is a liar. Unfortunately trying to stop him is not so easy; just as many millions of German people didn't want to go along with Hitler, well, Hitler just seized power and did what he wanted anyhow. Fighting against this is like fighting against some giant 'Octopus of Evil," I guess this is the same bad situation that led to such myths as the Hydra, the many headed snake whose heads grew again as they were cut off. And other such myths that speak to the realities of evils that are hard to overcome or resist because of its pervasive or enduring quality and its many faces, many groups and organizations, many avenues of influence and multifarious and multifaceted aspects. Yup. Where's a ... |
View the Top Clips from November 4, 2007
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
|
|
|
