He recently was a key speaker at the youth conference PowerShift 2009 in Washington, D.C. in March of this year. Some of the statements Jones made at that conference show he still holds to the beliefs of his past.

Jones said at one point during his speech, "This movement is deeper than a solar panel! Deeper than a solar panel! Don't stop there! Don't stop there! We're gonna change the whole system! We're gonna change the whole thing. We're not gonna put a new battery in a broken system. We want a new system. We want a new system!"

During a recent interview as head of the Ella Baker Center Jones said, "We're really entering a third wave of environmentalism in the United States. The white po...

He recently was a key speaker at the youth conference PowerShift 2009 in Washington, D.C. in March of this year. Some of the statements Jones made at that conference show he still holds to the beliefs of his past.

Jones said at one point during his speech, "This movement is deeper than a solar panel! Deeper than a solar panel! Don't stop there! Don't stop there! We're gonna change the whole system! We're gonna change the whole thing. We're not gonna put a new battery in a broken system. We want a new system. We want a new system!"

During a recent interview as head of the Ella Baker Center Jones said, "We're really entering a third wave of environmentalism in the United States. The white polluters and the white environmentalists are essentially steering poison into the people of color communities."

Race seems to be a part of nearly everything Jones says. Does anyone really believe that white people are intentionally poisoning minorities? Wasn't the Obama administration supposed to be the beginning of a "post-racial" America? Wasn't Obama going to transcend race? To lead us into something better? Why does he have "special advisors" out there openly attempting to create an even bigger racial divide? Trying to stir up hatred and anger?

During a 2005 interview Jones said, "I'm willing to forgo the cheap satisfaction of the radical pose for the deep satisfaction of radical ends."
What exactly does that mean? It says Jones has simply changed his tactics. Instead of publicly describing himself as a communist and being openly radical he will use a more subversive approach. What else could you possibly read into it?

In 2005, following Hurricane Katrina, Jones co-founded a Web-based grassroots organization addressing Black issues called Color of Change. Jones left the group in 2007. Color of Change is the group that recently called for an advertiser boycott of Glenn Beck's afternoon Fox News program. It seems to have had a reverse effect.

Since the boycott began Beck's ratings have been at their highest levels ever. You don't go after someone like that unless they're hitting a nerve. Unless they're onto something. Unless you're afraid of the message they're trying to deliver. Unless you want to silence them.

My conclusion after many hours of research is that Beck has not presented a single dishonest statement about Jones. Everything Beck has claimed can be easily found with the smallest amount of effort. The biggest problem I had was deciding what to include in this article and what to leave out. The amount of information out there is mountainous.

We all should indeed be demanding that President Obama address this. There is...

Since the boycott began Beck's ratings have been at their highest levels ever. You don't go after someone like that unless they're hitting a nerve. Unless they're onto something. Unless you're afraid of the message they're trying to deliver. Unless you want to silence them.

My conclusion after many hours of research is that Beck has not presented a single dishonest statement about Jones. Everything Beck has claimed can be easily found with the smallest amount of effort. The biggest problem I had was deciding what to include in this article and what to leave out. The amount of information out there is mountainous.

We all should indeed be demanding that President Obama address this. There is no place in our government for anyone who overtly espouses tearing down our entire system and replacing it with something else. Their should be no room for a man who wants to worsen racial tensions instead of trying to help heal old wounds. And Jones isn't the only one. When you really look deep at what is happening it is frightening.

I don't see Beck as a racist, conspiracy-theorist lunatic. I see him as someone with a genuine concern for what's going on in our government. I share his concern. It's not a race issue, at least on this side. It's not a Republican or Democrat issue. It's an issue of people who are for, as Barack Obama put it just five days before the election, "fundamenatally changing the The United States of America."

We should be demanding some answers from President Obama. Why would such a person would be advising him? Did you know Van Jones held these views when you appointed him? If so, why did you appoint him?

It is a rare soul, indeed, who does not sense that something's not right in America. But because of lack of true leadership, we don't know what to do about it. Thus, we are immobilized by indecisiveness.

The truth is, there's nothing you can or should do about it, because something is being done about it already. It's called "Inevitability."

There is a Law of Social Cycles that governs the Four Natural Classes of Men: Warriors, Intellectuals, Acquisitors, and Laborers. With the exception of the Laborers, each class rules in turn. No single Class can rule forever.
See Here: Law of Social Cycles
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Social_Cycle

Without giving a History lesson or philosop...

It is a rare soul, indeed, who does not sense that something's not right in America. But because of lack of true leadership, we don't know what to do about it. Thus, we are immobilized by indecisiveness.

The truth is, there's nothing you can or should do about it, because something is being done about it already. It's called "Inevitability."

There is a Law of Social Cycles that governs the Four Natural Classes of Men: Warriors, Intellectuals, Acquisitors, and Laborers. With the exception of the Laborers, each class rules in turn. No single Class can rule forever.
See Here: Law of Social Cycles
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Social_Cycle

Without giving a History lesson or philosophical/astrological discussion of Synchronicity, the era of Acquisitors-cum-Laborers ended March 20, 2003 with the invasion of Iraq.

This is the moment that the Dawn of the Age of the Warrior began, appropriately enough, in the astrological sign of Aries, the God of War.

Because March 20, 2003, heralded the Decline of the Acquisitors, I believe that Military leaders of all Nations, those who have earned the right to call themselves "Soldiers," the highest address by which a man may be called, are preparing to meet in a secret summit of their own to determine if their Brother Soldiers, who have been placed in their charge by God, are truly fighting the Noble Fight in defense of God, Family, and Country, and not being demeaned as mercenaries, employed as private security forces for the Acquisitors whose time is nearly ended.

Six years ago, I reported that because we had entered the Age of the Warrior, the demising of the Age of the Aquisitors, that a Military Coup is imminent.

Those who are of the Warrior Class may soon be rejoicing at the prospect of becoming, once more, the Dominant Class of Society, demanding respect and homage from the non-combatants who are currently sitting in their seats.

And he isn't the only one. His FCC diversity czar Mark Lloyd said this:

"It should be clear by now that my focus here is not freedom of speech or the press. This freedom is all too often an exaggeration. At the very least, blind references to freedom of speech or the press serve as a distraction from the critical examination of other communications policies.

"[T]he purpose of free speech is warped to protect global corporations and block rules that would promote democratic governance."

Remember, this guy is at the FCC.

"In Venezuela, with Chavez, is really an incredible revolution - a democratic revolution. To begin to put in place things that are goin...

read more»

And he isn't the only one. His FCC diversity czar Mark Lloyd said this:

"It should be clear by now that my focus here is not freedom of speech or the press. This freedom is all too often an exaggeration. At the very least, blind references to freedom of speech or the press serve as a distraction from the critical examination of other communications policies.

"[T]he purpose of free speech is warped to protect global corporations and block rules that would promote democratic governance."

Remember, this guy is at the FCC.

"In Venezuela, with Chavez, is really an incredible revolution - a democratic revolution. To begin to put in place things that are going to have an impact on the people of Venezuela.

"The property owners and the folks who then controlled the media in Venezuela rebelled - worked, frankly, with folks here in the U.S. government - worked to oust him. But he came back with another revolution, and then Chavez began to take very seriously the media in his country.

"And we've had complaints about this ever since."

He praises Chavez for shutting down the media and confiscating private property and he is now the FCC diversity czar.