BBC Excuse No.1

""The decision was made because of question marks about the delivery of aid in a volatile situation "

When is aid NOT needed in a volatile situation? Who risks life and limb in these situation? Not the BBC. Why are they arbitrating against Gaza where even the UNRWA stores were razed by deliberate Zionist shelling.

There is a grave suspicion that this deliberate destroying of UN supplies had a much more sinister purpose than the Zionists' usual destructive tendencies. These supplies are sourced at usury prices by the UN from Israel. By destroying them, they needed to be replenished at even higher usury prices. So supplies from non-Zionist sources are unwelcome ...

BBC Excuse No.1

""The decision was made because of question marks about the delivery of aid in a volatile situation "

When is aid NOT needed in a volatile situation? Who risks life and limb in these situation? Not the BBC. Why are they arbitrating against Gaza where even the UNRWA stores were razed by deliberate Zionist shelling.

There is a grave suspicion that this deliberate destroying of UN supplies had a much more sinister purpose than the Zionists' usual destructive tendencies. These supplies are sourced at usury prices by the UN from Israel. By destroying them, they needed to be replenished at even higher usury prices. So supplies from non-Zionist sources are unwelcome for the obvious reasons.

Is the BBC complicate in this sinister Zionist policy? The Zionist have no concept of neutrality on ANYTHING. If the BBC claim to report impartially, that translates into only what the Zionists allow them report from the vantage point of Jerusalem. Embeded here means in-bed-with! Not of course that even this complicity will stop the Zionist whining if their victim cloak is upset by TRUE victims. 60 years of begging-bowls is hard to give up.

Decades of supplying Gaza at exorbitant prices was the main point in attempts to destroy the tunnels. Usury not security. The on/off siege could never be fully effective while the tunnels allowed an alternate supply to the prisoners!

Protest over BBC Gaza appeal veto
A protest is to be held outside the BBC's London HQ over its refusal to broadcast a charity appeal for Gaza.

Health minister Ben Bradshaw, a former BBC journalist, said the BBC's reasoning was flawed.

"First, the one about delivery - the British government is giving £25m to Gazan relief, we don't have a problem getting it in. There's no reason why there should be any problem getting the relief in.

"Secondly, this nervousness about being biased. I'm afraid the BBC has to stand up to the Israeli authorities occasionally."

Mr Benn will address the pro-Palestinian rally called by ...

Protest over BBC Gaza appeal veto
A protest is to be held outside the BBC's London HQ over its refusal to broadcast a charity appeal for Gaza.

Health minister Ben Bradshaw, a former BBC journalist, said the BBC's reasoning was flawed.

"First, the one about delivery - the British government is giving £25m to Gazan relief, we don't have a problem getting it in. There's no reason why there should be any problem getting the relief in.

"Secondly, this nervousness about being biased. I'm afraid the BBC has to stand up to the Israeli authorities occasionally."

Mr Benn will address the pro-Palestinian rally called by the Stop the War Coalition, and is expected to say the BBC's refusal is a "betrayal" of its obligations.

'Disgraceful decision' "The decision of the BBC to refuse to broadcast a national humanitarian appeal for Gaza, which has left aid agencies with a potential shortfall of millions of pounds in donations, is a betrayal of the obligation which it owes as a public service.

"To deny the help that the aid agencies and the UN need at this moment in time is incomprehensible and it follows the bias in BBC reporting of this crisis, which has been widely criticised.