Shammaa also says the Sphinx (and its counterpart) is much older than the pyramids; he estimates both statues were present at Giza in early Predynastic Period, many centuries before the Great Pyramid was built. The "face" of sphinx does not have much importance here; probably the original one had a much different look than the one we see now. (The size of its head is considerably small, compared to its body, for example. All evidence indicate a retouch, probably during Khafre's reign.)

As it is said on the source:

“The Endeavor Satellite released by Nasa over the Pyramids Plateau confirmed the finding. But it makes a lot of sense that lightening could have damaged the Sphinx because...

Shammaa also says the Sphinx (and its counterpart) is much older than the pyramids; he estimates both statues were present at Giza in early Predynastic Period, many centuries before the Great Pyramid was built. The "face" of sphinx does not have much importance here; probably the original one had a much different look than the one we see now. (The size of its head is considerably small, compared to its body, for example. All evidence indicate a retouch, probably during Khafre's reign.)

As it is said on the source:

“The Endeavor Satellite released by Nasa over the Pyramids Plateau confirmed the finding. But it makes a lot of sense that lightening could have damaged the Sphinx because the statue was often depicted wearing a double metal crown that must have conducted the shock to the neck,” stated El Shammaa.

It's always better to read the original source, before commenting on clips.

The full article is here.