 davboz says: No! March'07,his warnings only came when the end-user was at risk.He was at the roots of promoting, demanding,and inspiring the drive to swell home"ownership" numbers and promote unnatural preferences for non-creditworthy borrowers - by ANY methods or means. Head of the line taking Fannie $, and being fully aware that the policies being implemented could NOT POSSIBLY be resulting in the "desired" numbers if they were ethical and business-wise, Obama was SILENT. He only spoke up when it was unavoidable that HIS policies would be coming to a REAL BAD END. And since he had no other choice but to speak up, being a candidate. Sure, it is a good and timely message. And it serves well as one being brought up as a supporting and bolstering "warning" to what had been earlier, and many more, primary warnings about the fundamental operations of the organizations that were dysfunctional and completely unethical in their operations. He added an almost "last minute", me-too warning only when the methods his "organizing" supporters had demanded (*) were finally shaken down the tubes to the bottom, back into visibility, where all could see the "homeowners" failing. While not taking responsibility, personally, he did it the way he had to do - on the level of the people. And it's a worthwhile statement. His skirting responsib... |
View the Top Clips from October 2, 2008
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
|
|
|
|
New from the makers of Clipmarks: Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!
|
|
