RecordSage - "It could be... arguably yours could be as well instead of writing this comment..."

I have not been put in charge of running the country nor do I get a 6 figure paycheck as payment for the running of the country. They have... so I think your comment is not valid.

RecordSage - "I'm glad they did... people have to stand for something... there's too much of 'anything goes' as is."

If they want to stand for something, they should stand for passing laws that actually do something like putting a stop on the Bush administration's out of control spending, stopping Bush's miss handled war, or better yet, stand up for the constitution and stop this Bush administration from doing all...

RecordSage - "It could be... arguably yours could be as well instead of writing this comment..."

I have not been put in charge of running the country nor do I get a 6 figure paycheck as payment for the running of the country. They have... so I think your comment is not valid.

RecordSage - "I'm glad they did... people have to stand for something... there's too much of 'anything goes' as is."

If they want to stand for something, they should stand for passing laws that actually do something like putting a stop on the Bush administration's out of control spending, stopping Bush's miss handled war, or better yet, stand up for the constitution and stop this Bush administration from doing all the unconstitutional acts they have been given the freedom to do.

These things are a hell of a lot more important then waisting time passing a law that does nothing but complain about someone exercising their constitutional right of "Free Speech" .

No, you haven't... but it's really easy to sit and write all kinds of 'progressive' stuff from your chair, isn't it... you don't get the responsibility, the 6 figures... and of course you have no real insight into what's going on outside of the mainstream press, or kooky blogs, yet you have the answers and you certainly know and do fault others... what could be simpler than that.

As for spending - it's interesting how you fail to understand the basic concept of how the government works. The President does NOT spend money, whatever gets spent, whether he wants it or not, must be appropriated by the Congress. So, if you want to throw your finger at someone for spending - go after the real p...

No, you haven't... but it's really easy to sit and write all kinds of 'progressive' stuff from your chair, isn't it... you don't get the responsibility, the 6 figures... and of course you have no real insight into what's going on outside of the mainstream press, or kooky blogs, yet you have the answers and you certainly know and do fault others... what could be simpler than that.

As for spending - it's interesting how you fail to understand the basic concept of how the government works. The President does NOT spend money, whatever gets spent, whether he wants it or not, must be appropriated by the Congress. So, if you want to throw your finger at someone for spending - go after the real people appropriating the funds. Besides, there have been several occasions where he refused to sign some of the expenditures because they were excessive in his view.

As for Free Speech - they exercised theirs in Congress... they still can exercise it as well, can't they? Or is it that when moveon.org does something - it's free speech, however stupid and inept it might be, not to mention being meritless and without any proof of what they claim... yet if someone in Congress wants to say something contrary - the Free Speech element becomes 'waste of time'. Do you see your own hypocrisy there?

oh yes I have... oooha (such a joke you are)

How you can conclude that I fail to understand the basic concept of how the government works based on a few lines I wrote is simply moronic you your part.

It seem you have had your head in the sand for the 6 years Bush had congress give him everything he asked for. During this 6 year period, Bush did not veto a single bill. He did direct the spending because he gave them his budgets and they gave him everything he asked for. It seems you are not as well informed as you think.

Yes they exercised their free speech but I stand on what I said before about the time and money they waisted doing something that did nothing when they should have bee...

oh yes I have... oooha (such a joke you are)

How you can conclude that I fail to understand the basic concept of how the government works based on a few lines I wrote is simply moronic you your part.

It seem you have had your head in the sand for the 6 years Bush had congress give him everything he asked for. During this 6 year period, Bush did not veto a single bill. He did direct the spending because he gave them his budgets and they gave him everything he asked for. It seems you are not as well informed as you think.

Yes they exercised their free speech but I stand on what I said before about the time and money they waisted doing something that did nothing when they should have been taking care of far more important things.

"and of course you have no real insight into what's going on outside of the mainstream press, or kooky blogs, yet you have the answers and you certainly know and do fault others... what could be simpler than that."

You have no idea what I read or expose myself to. Your willingness to make statements which you know good and well that you can not possible know is very enlightening to your character or lack there of. Because you are so willing do this, you have lost all credibility and therefore not worthy of any further attention.

Looks like ezsparky sparked out... happens... people who are actually in the know don't blabber like you do, which leads to the conclusion that what you say, or I say, or anyone else says here is nothing more then speculation on our part. We could be right, we could also be wrong, regardless of our 'sources'.

As for me making the comments about you, which you misinterpreted to a degree, but that's online discussion... and claiming I "lost credibility" - don't flatter yourself... I may not know you, but you don't know me any better... it works both ways. I have sufficient credibility with people I care to have it with... you were never intended to be on that list... so your comment there i...

Looks like ezsparky sparked out... happens... people who are actually in the know don't blabber like you do, which leads to the conclusion that what you say, or I say, or anyone else says here is nothing more then speculation on our part. We could be right, we could also be wrong, regardless of our 'sources'.

As for me making the comments about you, which you misinterpreted to a degree, but that's online discussion... and claiming I "lost credibility" - don't flatter yourself... I may not know you, but you don't know me any better... it works both ways. I have sufficient credibility with people I care to have it with... you were never intended to be on that list... so your comment there is... useless for all intensive purposes.

Moving on... (without the .org, that is)