Clipmarks
Eaglewingsfollowshare
1-12-2007 8:39 PM
684 views
Eaglewings says:
Although its been said many times many ways...
14 Comments   | Add a Comment
1-12-2007 10:10 PM
Babyvan
Yup!
1-12-2007 10:19 PM
hipster
Good one EW...evolution is bunch of wishful non-believers trying to believe in something.
1-12-2007 10:50 PM
enbar
Can you guys actually explain this reasoning about the crab-eating Indian frog and so forth? It doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

I'm talking about the article the source links to (here), rather than the rather gleeful but content-free post on Crosswalk.
1-12-2007 11:08 PM
Eaglewings
In simple terms. The evolution took place a long time ago and does not now exist. All life forms seem to mimic the same characteristics thus elimiting external influence from their developement.

Or something like that.
1-13-2007 1:03 AM
enbar
Hmm... I still don't get it.
1-13-2007 2:21 AM
rmowery
So this clip is basically discounting the idea of evolution?
Considering fossils of dinosaurs have been found - yes, they are in museums and they were not created by Hollywood. Considering that Alligators and Crocks most likely evolved from dinosaurs, I cannot understand where these folks get there logic or thougths?

Since it was clipped from a Christian website, it would appear they are trying to argue that some divine being (aka God) simply reached down out the sky and put a male and female being here.

They take the Bible to literally. The Hebrew version (true version) of the first 5 books coincides with the idea of starting out from earth and evolving into a form,which we call man/wom...
1-13-2007 11:26 AM
Eaglewings
So this clip is basically discounting the idea of evolution?
Actually no this clip just reports about scientific study that unfortunately does not support the theory of evolution. However this same science seems to indicate a sameness amongst the species. This same science also seems to indicate that yes there was evolution but it happened at once and a long time ago.

Since it was clipped from a Christian website, it would appear they are
trying to argue that some divine being (aka God) simply reached down
out the sky and put a male and female being here.
OH because of the source it is unreliable? How about this link?
[url=http://www.americanchronicle.com/art...
1-13-2007 11:27 AM
Eaglewings
Hmm... I still don't get it.
It's science
1-14-2007 2:42 PM
divingod2000
I'll say at the start that I fully support the theory of evolution (along with the entire scientific community); but say for the sake of argument that there is no evidence for it, that it turns out not to be true. Does that mean that we should just revert to some bronze-age belief written in the desert 4000 years ago (which also has no evidence, btw)? And if so, which one? If I have to pick an ancient myth to believe because science has failed so miserably, I still certainly wouldn't go for the one in the Bible!
1-14-2007 6:59 PM
Eaglewings
Unfortunately the world is made up of people who would rather believe anything as long as it does not include a belief in an absolute divine being we are all accountable to. It is far better to manufactor a belief system rather than accept the one that God set forth.

However. that being said it takes far more faith to believe in evolution considering there is absolutely no FACTs to support it than to believe in say Jesus Christ walked the earth. If in fact Jesus walked the earth then just perhaps there is evidence of God the Father manifested in Jesus Christ His Son.

Course people who believe in evolution oftimes do not believe in Jesus either.

But to add fuel to the fire here is anoth...
1-15-2007 3:23 AM
rmowery
EW - Perhaps there was a man named Jesus that walked the earth, perhaps not.

I do believe however there is a divine being - whether one calls him Abba, Father, God, Allah, Buddah, El Shadiah, YVHV, Ainsof, etc. that really does not matter.

I cannot except the fact that a divine being would want to or need to manifest himself into a human form - there would be no reason. It is of course possible to imagine that he/she would provide special gifts to allow communication with itself to humans.

While I think the premise of Christianity has some good points in helping mankind - I would argue that if the New Testament is in fact the words from the man named Jesus - that our world has not r...
1-15-2007 9:07 AM
Eaglewings
I cannot except the fact that a divine being would want to or need to manifest
himself into a human form - there would be no reason.
The reason? For God so loved the world that He sent His son so whosoever believeth in Him shall not perish but have everlasting life.

For all of sinned and come short of the glory of God therefore it was necessary for God to send a redeemer to redeem man from the curse of SIN and DEATH and to redeem the world back to HIMSELF.

one thing is for certiain - Mankind has wrecked this planet, worn out
our welcome, and have not lived as a global society by any of the
teachings that any of the religons profess - so in essence the world is
pret...
1-15-2007 10:15 AM
divingod2000
It's not that the people you speak of, Eaglewings, would rather believe in anything but an almighty being-- it's just that, if we are going to believe in an almighty being, it damn sure better be an actual almighty being! A god who creates the world but somehow does not foresee it going horribly wrong, who blames human beings for the "design bugs" that he himself put there, and then, despite being composed entirely of love, despite being fully given to forgiveness, chooses to send his creations to an everlasting torture? And for those few that he does choose to save, he can't just do it, he has to go through the ridiculous soap opera of coming to earth in human form, preaching some un...
1-15-2007 2:37 PM
Eaglewings
Now. Let's clarify that I do believe in a Supreme Being-- you might call it the
God of Spinoza-- and that I can read the New Testament in its original
languages. It's not about what we non-Christians "desperately want" to believe--
it's about what we am compelled to believe, usually by great amounts of
religious education, and devoted thinking on the issue. Which makes us,
ironically, more religious than you Christians.
The part that did not make the eidt:

Which makes us,
ironically, more religious than you Christians.
Religious yes perhaps, but lost nontheless. I shall be praying for you that the god of this age who has blinded your understanding to th...
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK