What? The USA did not object? I rechecked too. Actually that the UNHRC wasn't really the story. Your question that "the USA did not object" was. I was waiting for a smart cookie like you, Masbury, to highlight the REAL point of the clip. Thanks - unless I misunderstand, that is a significant change of direction! I'm sure the significance was not lost on the Jerusalem readers! Often, what is missing is as significant as what is included. Is the USA a member of the UNHRC? Kicked out??? Smart cookies might ask: Who are the members? I guess that makes you a smart cookie, mousie. Even worse, not eligible for membership??? From 2008: GENEVA, June 6 (Reuters) - The United States has quietly informed Western allies of its intention to walk away from the U.N. Human Rights Council, diplomatic sources said on Friday. Thanks - unless I misunderstand, that is a significant change of direction!How's that for a "change" of direction, masbury? Any chance it might 'disengage' from the UN and give peace a chance? Or maybe in its more cash strapped times, diplomacy might be rediscovered instead of invasion? Any chance it might 'disengage' from the UNOne can hope. LO Really L! all we need is a few more smart cookies. After the London conference and the Chinese lay down the law, we may not have to wait too long. Maybe all the smart cookies have already departed to pastures new. |
View the Top Clips from March 27, 2009
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
New from the makers of Clipmarks: Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!
|
|||||||||||||