michellezm says: Consider some of the latest facts: * On average, 50 people are killed each day. Johannesburg, the capital city, is one of the most violent places on earth outside a war zone. * A staggering 150 women a day report being raped. One can only imagine the numbers who do not report this atrocity. To place this statistic in a more vivid perspective, BBC News reports that “one in four girls faces the prospect of being raped before the age of 16…” Or put another way, “It is a fact that a woman born in South Africa has a greater chance of being raped, than learning how to read.” * From 1992 to 2002 sexual violence against children has increased a staggering 400%. And baby rape is not uncommon and not a new phenomenon either! * As of the year 2000, 50% of the 43 million South African citizens lived below the poverty line. Thanks for the information, Michelle. I think most people are unaware of these statistics. It's horrendous what is happening to your country. My heart goes out to all of you. Forgive my ignorance about the history of South Africa but I've wanted to ask this question concerning the time when it was under the control of Britain. Were the living conditions and the political unrest less then? or just different? From the moment the first Portugese set foot on the South African coast during the 16th Century (date might be wrong) and in the succeeding Dutch, British and Afrikaner rule, all blacks were oppressed. 1994 was the first time since the first white man set foot on this land that the blacks have gained power and sefl-determination. What's happening now is called "payback". Unlike North America, New Zealand and Australia, in South Africa the indigenous people outnumber the 'settlers'. (And many still enjoy chanting, "one settler, one bullet"). There are 40 million blacks and now only 3 million whites left (2 million having taken the 'chicken run' and fled since black rule). The world hail... Thanks for the interest Alanocu. To Jatfla, my apologies, I was to high up on my soapbox I forgot to answer your question. There has always been crime. But the white regime ruled with an iron fist and the death penalty was used with a vengeance. (I stand to be corrected, but if memory serves me correctly we hung more criminals than any other country in the world), The death penalty was abolished after independance and the crime rate has soared since then. There is a huge disparity between the haves and the have nots. Most of the wealth is still concentrated in white hands and poverty and unemployment (sans a social security system) is rife. What wealth has been redistributed has lan... I appreciated your "rant" also. There's so much corruption, so many tyrants, so much evil in the world. In America it's impossible for me to comprehend it all. It seems hopeless because the problems are so massive and global. When I think of the billions in foreign aid that we have given; and it's mostly gone to corrupt individuals and organizations, including the UN. Our churches use to dedicate their human resources and money to humanitarian operations there, but the need is so vast. There's so much corruption, so many tyrants, so much evil in the world.jatfla @...jatfla Do you ever wonder why it is into corrupt leaders bank accounts that the aid ends up? Can it be directed so badly,so often? Or is there a pattern of choosing less than honest persons? Just check out Iraq's leaders "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" would indicate that this misdirection of aid is deliberate. I agree with you Jatfla. Going to read that Righthand. Thanks. What happened to the ideals Nelson Mandella tried to establish? Did they die with him? Ideals Skwirl? There were none. Mandela is a figurehead only. He is a man-made icon. He had to emerge from prison a 'saint' in order to keep this country stable. One word from him and all whites could have been eradicated. But in order to develop the new black government and to encourage foreign aid and investment he was placed on a pedestal and he's acted his part. Thankfully. No, the man I have true respect for is Archbishop Desmond Tutu. Now there's a good man. He has done more to broker peace and reconciliation than any other South African and he has done it honestly and sincerely. This is my opinion of course, for what it's worth. I have heard of Tutu but I don't know his story. I always put Mandela and Tutu in the same category; figureheads as you suggested of Mandela. Why would we think Tutu was any different? Because throughout apartheid rule he has been the voice of reason, sanity and conscience. He is completely unbiased and is unafraid to speak out against all wrongs - on both sides. He loves people more than power and he has demonstrated that throughout his life. He headed up the Truth and Reconciliation Committee which was formed when the our black government came into power. This was a forum offering amnesty to anyone, black and white, to come forward and make a clean breast of their past atrocities. Many took advantage of this opportunity. And for the first time all white South Africans got to hear the horror stories. (Bear in mind everything we read was heavily censored under the a... This has been an education for us. Thank you, Michelle. This has been an education for us. Thank you, Michelle.ditto |
View the Top Clips from June 2, 2007
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||