I can't say I agree with you Bear. The limitations of the debate are well described and net neutrality isn't part of it.
You could be right if you mean that the debate might be to much detached from reality if it doesn't treat the topic of net neutrality. But it's out of the scope of this debate. It focusses on gatekeepers, of the thrustworthiness of communal 'wisdom'.
To be honest, I find it enlightening to find a debate that does limit itself to this scope and does not focus on the topic of net neutrality.

And to Tanyamm,
I think that the main goal of educational institutes should be the practice of learning students the skills to interpret the information from various sources, such as t...

I can't say I agree with you Bear. The limitations of the debate are well described and net neutrality isn't part of it.
You could be right if you mean that the debate might be to much detached from reality if it doesn't treat the topic of net neutrality. But it's out of the scope of this debate. It focusses on gatekeepers, of the thrustworthiness of communal 'wisdom'.
To be honest, I find it enlightening to find a debate that does limit itself to this scope and does not focus on the topic of net neutrality.

And to Tanyamm,
I think that the main goal of educational institutes should be the practice of learning students the skills to interpret the information from various sources, such as the internet. In that perspective, any institute that forbids the use of internet to their students, cannot be a real educational institution. More than one way of looking at things is indispensable for any person that wishes to learn.